Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Looking backward

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The embattled president of the Bharatiya Janata Party, Rajnath Singh, has never been known for choosing his words with care. But, at his best, he has a certain bluntness which is useful — useful in that, without evasion or circumlocution, it tells us exactly how the BJP is going wrong. His most recent statement, at a ceremony felicitating Madhya Pradesh partyman Kailash Narayan Sarang in Bhopal, is exemplary. A law, he said, was necessary to “check” large-scale religious conversion. (A law that he seemed to think would “give freedom to people to choose their religion”, which adds an inability with simple logic to Singh’s many virtues.)

    Rajnath Singh might think that fanning the flames of paranoia about a Hinduism under siege might make for good politics. That, for him, might be the lessons of the ’90s. But that has been tried ad infinitum recently — and it doesn’t work any more. (Remember how the Amarnath land agitation was to be a nationwide stir? And help win the general election for the BJP?) Instead of retreating to that past, the BJP must look forward.

    Ads by Google

    More, with every such illiberal pronouncement, the BJP declares itself ever more unready to recover the mantle of being a truly modern party of government. Whatever the genuineness of concerns about how delicate social structures in parts of India that have been unchanged for centuries are being put under pressure by religious activity of one sort or another, there is little that a liberal state can do about it. And if it were to, how short a step is it from interdicting individuals’ religious activity that is considered dangerous to social cohesion to clamping down on economic or political activity that does the same? These are questions that any responsible party must ask before proposing constitutional changes. But once again the BJP’s leadership has failed the most basic tests — for common sense, and for a liberal sensibility. Let these be the last few months that Rajnath Singh, in particular, is the standard-bearer of India’s largest opposition party. The longer he stays so, the more he diminishes us all.

    These secular liberals are foolsBy: S T | 03-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The Islamists and Christian missionaries have a generational agenda - they plan for a few centuries to convert whole of India and possibly break it up. The liberals and seculars should understand that if these conversionists have it their way, secularism and liberalism will be finished forever.The islamic
    CONVERSIONSBy: RAGHUNADHA RAO | 03-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward We do not comprehend why BJP Cannot get rid of out dated issuesand reorient the party with national issues like security,povertyinefficiency and corruption in public life.It is in fact necessaryfor an alternate political party like BJP.It is also surprising as to why the party is retaining the tag of communal party while in fact the others in the name of secularism resort to vote bankpolitics of appeasement.Conversion by allurement and demeaning other faiths is definitely wrong.Canvassing and marketing religion at temples of other religions is inappropriate.It is happening in isolated places by some misguided Zealots .The problem with the party is lack of new blood and dependence on aged men and dated issues . Feeding with same food all the time brings aversion.
    Looking backwardBy: V.Padmanabhan | 02-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward It is time for the BJP to get rid of its party president before long to avoid further damages being inflicted on the already bruised party apparatus and its future!
    Politics = ReligionBy: vijay | 02-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward In US of A, people questioned religion of Obama and asked him explicitly if he was a Muslim. Politics and Religion do mix in every part of the world.
    looking BackwardBy: S Kumar | 02-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Seriously people must look at the conversion issue. on NDTV when they discussed the issue of how Muslims would have been in an undivided India - Before 1947 they were 25% of the population, today if it was one Country they would be about 35%. During the same period Hinduism has declined from 75% pre 1947 borders to now 65% (if you include Pakistan and Bangladesh). So is the BJP argument about conversion propaganda ? We must adopt a realistic approach to this problem. One of my own ex-friends became christian when he was offered incentives to do this. Evangelical christians believe that outside the church there is no salvation !!!what stunned me when I visited an Indian Church in england, was that White Christians are more relaxed about their faith and are accomodating, but it is the new converts (most of whom are Asian ) who are the most belligerent !
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.