Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Loopholes galore in Dehradun Police's 'encounter' story

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    They had panicked on being approached by the police official since two of them were carrying country made fire arms. The police say that the number of the motorcycle on which they had fled was flashed around and they were intercepted by the police on the ring road.

    They claim that the three had tried to flee by firing at the police and one of them was killed in the exchange of fire while the remaining two had managed to escape. The police also say that the motorcycle recovered from the spot of the incident was a stolen one and belongs to a resident of Panipat district in Haryana.

    However, a major flaw has emerged in the claim of the deceased’s family that the boy was to join a private concern in Selaqui as the officials at the office of the firm disclosed on conditions of anonymity that they had no intimation of the boy being recruited for their office and neither did they know of any campus recruitment done for the purpose.

    Ads by Google

    Another major lacuna in the police story is the 28 injuries that have been pointed in the autopsy report. Narender Singh pointed, “There were 28 ante mortem injuries which the Police will find difficult to explain.”

    Out of these 12 were bullet injuries but the remaining were non bullet injuries which are a pointer the possibility of the boy having been tortured.

    As human rights activist and a Nainital based lawyer PC Tewari said, “The blackening of his skin at the spot where he had been hit by the bullets which suggests that he had been shot from less than three feet. Since he was shot in the chest, this defies the police claims that he was trying to flee.”

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    ranbirBy: gabar singh | 28-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward this is very sad that all are blaming police for the fake encounter of the police but why reporter not asking this question that what ranbir was doing with the pistol, and how much courage he has that he dared to open fire on a police officer. it was officer luck that the pistol was locked. if an educated man open fire in public than he should be punished but not encountered.
    Dehradun Police By: AKC | 18-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I am sorry for the family of Ranbir and do hope that Bhatt will be severely punished if Ranbir was innocent but I definitely do not find any merit in the view that Ranbir was innocent because he was a MBA or did not have a past record of crime. Let it be investigated. Criminals among students are not an unknown phenomenon and the present apparatus of crime makes only educated suitable for big crimes. Many terror activities are committed and supported by highly educated individuals all over the world. Similarly not all criminals have past record of crime, there may not even be first time for many hardened criminals. I do not know if Kasab, the perpetrator of 26/11 crime had a past record of crime. Somebody could enlighten.
    Lament Ranbir's death By: AKC | 18-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I am not happy with the way media handles and sensationalizes events. In a civil society the media should be a watch dog and it should discharge its duty of reporting facts sincerely, honestly, without fear but impartially. Such behavior of media strengthens institutions of governance in society. But investigation of crime is a serious business and the media or ordinary citizens like us who expressed so many views do not have the role or competence to investigate the crime or to conclude if a man is guilty. They must desist from it. Government has created Agencies to investigate crimes and judiciary to decide guilty. Even if we are not happy with the functioning of these agencies, we can’t permit this role to be performed by the Media. Self assumption of such roles by media or ordinary citizen is fraught with danger particularly in a country like India with large no. of poor and ill educated population who could be easily manipulated.
    Suspend and arrest SSP Amit Sinha and his gang of butchersBy: Satish Negi | 08-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward If the CM Nishank fails to recommend CBI inquery then this is going to be a disaster for Uttarakhand. He represents common people and should understand that saving criminals in the Uttarakhand police department will ruin the state. I was associated with Uttarakhand Movement and m witness to the UP police brutalities. Hence it is the duty of the Uttarakhandi community to initiate immediate action for weeding out the criminals from the police department. Amit Sinha And Ganpathy defended the actions of their fake encounter team. Why CM is not ordering the arrest of AMit Sinha and Ganaparhy ??? They might be IPS but they are not above law. Infact they will surely distroy the evidence during the so called CB CID investigation process.
    Death of Ranbir by Dehradun PoliceBy: Akhilesh Chaudhary | 18-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward There appears to be a well orchestrated effort to attack police all over the country. You attack them through terrorists act, naxal / maoist act or character assassination by media or through people of doubtful character like Negi. Let us pray that these are not part of a design of making the policing systems discredited and weak. But given the impassioned personalized coverage of police/ army atrocity events, can we really rule out media, criminal, terror, Negi nexus. Not the entire media is irresponsible but some definitely are not responsible. I still do not wish to gag them but it is necessary that their ownership is investigated for such nexus.
    Indian Police - the criminals with special license from GovernmentBy: Amit | 08-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Ordinary people turn into butchers and criminals as soon as they enter police in India. This is what they get in training from seniors already. I have a friend in Uttarakhand Police and I have stopped talking to him now because the way he started thinking
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.