You are here: IE »   Story

Losing plots

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    The 600-acre IT park at Rajarhat, near Kolkata, is the latest casualty of Bengal’s land acquisition tragedy and the state government’s abdication of responsibility post-Singur, post-electoral rout. The CPM appears to be struck by a paralysis of will that’s putting every developmental project on hold. If the government, led by the party, keeps retiring hurt, paranoid about the next election, the list of the disappointed will not end with a Tata Motors or an Infosys — notwithstanding a reformist chief minister who’s been missing the plot for a while and an intriguing land reforms minister who opposes industrial land acquisition, but gave vested land to a luxury resort, and now, caught up in controversy, wants the IT park scrapped.

    Indeed, the IT park is inextricably tied up with the Vedic Village controversy, as the land is contiguous to the resort and was to be acquired by Vedic’s developers for the government. Following violence and allegations of forcible land acquisition, the government has retreated. If Singur was about state acquisition of land, Vedic Village has exploded “direct” acquisition by developers. Evidently, neither Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee’s nor Mamata Banerjee’s preferred means of acquiring land is working. But the state government should not equate the mechanism of land acquisition with the fact of acquisition. The problem is with the former alone, where compensation packages do matter, while using goons unleashes all the goriness of Bengal’s brand of muscle politics.

    Ads by Google

    If West Bengal’s industrialisation is put on hold, its people will pay a heavy price. But industry will not come without land; thus the state must find a way out of this morass. Bengal’s rural poor need industrial expansion and its small farmers deserve viable land markets. The abandoned and locked plot of land in Singur cannot continue symbolising the state’s reality and prospects.

    The state will need to intervene --- ctdBy: Dinesh | 06-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward If the enterprise were forced to pay the extrapolated market rate - example the new rate of land after say an airport has come in the vicinity - the enterprise itself will become non-viable. The state cannot walk away fearing a political backlash. Ms Mamata Bannerji might have helped the farmers of Singur get back the land - but the damage to the Indian image worldwide has been very severe. The lesson learnt is that any group by means of agitations can force the Govt to renege on a land deal, and any deal involving a chunk of land with different landowners, with a few of them dissenting is not sacrosanct, even after paper work has not been completed. The implications to the FDI in manufacturing are tragic. The state must introduce legislatin to enforce the concept of 'en-bloc' sale or potentially all new mega projects face this threat.
    The state will need to interveneBy: Dinesh | 05-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Sir, The state will have to intervene. The landowning farmers or even flat owners should be permitted to form a cooperative and in case of majority voting for a sale, a minority should not be allowed to hold the rest to ransom. Example when 90% of farmers wish to sell the land at an agreed price, 10% farmers occupying land in-between should not be allowed to torpedo the deal.Forcible acquirement of land is wrong- but some enterprises such as power plants, irrigation schemes or even a Tata Nano factory - otherwise the enterprise itself becomes nonviable and the whole citizenry suffers and a trade off has to be made - between the rights of the truculent minority and the citizenry of the whole state. A concept of en-bloc sale has to be enforced by the state. It is not possible to please all when it comes to land price. The price of non-irrigated land in a remote village is relatively very less, but the same land, if in the vicinity of a mega enterprise is very very high. ----
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.