Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Luddite logic

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As Saubhik Chakrabarti points out in ‘Mao TV, MoU TV. And Mahatma’, in recent television appearances discussing Naxalite violence, Arundhati Roy and several other activists have made certain claims about socio-economic issues that are factually incorrect. For example, Roy argues that since Independence the rich have got richer and the poor poorer. This is wrong. The poverty ratio fell from 54.9 per cent in 1973-74 to 26.1 per cent in 1999-2000. These figures are based on official estimates, but several independent researchers, in India and abroad, have confirmed that the poverty ratio has declined significantly in both rural and urban India. Roy might find it interesting that almost the entire decline in the poverty ratio happened in the years since 1980 when India followed relatively market-friendly economic policies.

    Why then do Roy and her fellow activists keep making the claim that capitalism, economic growth and globalisation have impoverished the poor? Perhaps because if they admitted the evidence, it would be harder for them to continue advocating an economic philosophy and approach abandoned by China in 1978.

    Ads by Google

    — Sinchan Mitra

    Brisbane

    Remembering Bhabha

    The birth centenary of the father of India’s atomic energy programme, Homi Jehangir Bhabha fell on October 30. Bhabha was an outstanding scientist, innovator, social reformer, diplomat and organiser, who envisioned a bright future for India. His contribution to India’s success and development is widely acknowledged. Bhabha had a vision to make India a nuclear superpower almost 60 years ago.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    an example of corporatisation of the mediaBy: Lata Shenava | 19-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Tragically the media needs to avoid reporting news that they neither have valid information nor an understanding of ground realities. Some facts used for my pre-doc study- N. K. Singh (IE Sept 07-800 million- the poor & vulnerable of new India). while its true absolute poverty has decreased, the no of marginally poor and vulnerable increased to 77 per cent (836 million people). The high-income (from 163 to 254 million) and middle-income group comprise the affluent which is less than 300 million in 1 billion. So either you are saying Mr. Singh is wrong or Arundhati is right. Disregard of the multi-dimensional nature of poverty, either through ignorance or manipulation by hiding real facts is extremely disturbing. it is in poor taste to paint activist as rabid and noisy when journalists take the cake for being raucous and intrusive (Dutt, sardesai et al). Time to walk the talk Mr. C and back your accusations with some solid proof. finally, at least they believe in a cause.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.