Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Maha Govt's 'Live-in' proposal gets mixed response

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Couplem
    Live-in couples have mixed responses to Maharashtra govt's proposal to give 'wife' status to live-in partner
    Maharashtra government's nod to the 'live-in' proposal, where in it considered giving the status of a 'wife' to a woman, if she is involved in such a relationship for a "reasonable period", has received mixed reactions, raising fears of misuse.

    Nishita John, a professional working in a consultancy firm feels that the government need not bring in a legislation to regulate live-in relationships.

    "If the relationship between the two individuals is consensual, then both should also consider how they will manage if the relationship should fail.. it is not for the state to decide anything," she said.

    Maharashtra government had approved the proposal on October 8, based on recommendations of the Justice Mallimath Committee which said if a man and a woman are living together as husband and wife for a "reasonably long period", the man shall be deemed to have married the woman according to customary rights of either party.

    Ads by Google

    The committee had also mooted that the definition of the word 'wife' under Section 125 of the CrPc, be amended to include a woman, living with the man like his wife for a "reasonably long period".

    However, the definition of "reasonably long period" is missing from the recommendation, which has left many worried on account of its worthiness and ramifications as it may be grossly misused.

    "The period for which the couple live together should be clearly defined to ensure that it cannot be misused," Vivek Jaiswal, a software professional said.

    Also, such a legislation would be needed if the number of long-term live-in relationships was found to be high else it would serve little purpose, he said.

    Indian cities have been seeing a growing number of live-in relationships, a concept once frowned upon as being too 'Western', and popular culture like films have also begun to accept the reality of its existence.

    However, experts feel that the debate over the amendment was a larger one that extended beyond live-in relationships, which are more an urban phenomenon.

    "The amendment would be more useful to women living in rural areas. In many areas polygamy still exists with no legal rights for the second wife under law," lawyer and womens' right activist Veena Gowda said.

    This new definition of a wife under the CrPC would provide some financial protection to women who are in relationships that are deemed as marriage by the society they live-in but have no legal standing, she said.

    Let Individuals DecideBy: Pratap Pillai | 10-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward The concept of live-in relationships is not at all a marriage at first place. Marriage is all about a commitment for lifetime whereas live-in relationship is just by a choice where an individual wants to runaway from such responsibilities. Most of the people going in for a live-in relationship are those who are afraid of committing and who don't want the responsibilities that come along with being committed. They desire emotional/physical security of a relationship as well as the freedom and independence that comes of being a bachelor/spinster. Hence, in my humble opinion government shouldn’t go on legalize the female status as wife because this will definitely give undue advantages to females. As we all are aware that marital courts are highly inclined towards females and not at all supportive towards a male. Moreover, marriage is any day is miles better than a live-in relationship as sooner or later we all need somebody on whom we can fall back.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.