Premium
This is an archive article published on July 8, 2010

Make your staff more flexible,Jaiswal tells Jairam

Asking Union environment and forests minister Jairam Ramesh to sensitise his officials on the need for adopting a more pragmatic and flexible position...

Asking Union environment and forests minister Jairam Ramesh to sensitise his officials on the need for adopting a more pragmatic and flexible position on “vexatious issues” to help achieve overall energy security,coal minister Sriprakash Jaiswal has expressed concern that categorization of forest areas as A and B has triggered uncertainty among coal-block holders,many of whom have already made massive investments on the ground.

In a hard-hitting letter,Jaiswal reminded his MoEF counterpart that his categorisation of A and B areas would reduce coal availability,possibly by 600 million tonnes,which would leave no way for the coal ministry to provide enough resources despite the mineral’s acknowledged role as the driving force for achieving 8 per cent GDP growth on a sustained basis. “…we would be grateful if you could direct your authorities to take a more pragmatic and less rigid position on vexatious issues,keeping in mind the long-term energy security and the imperative of fuelling economic growth without compromising on issues pertaining to the ecology and environment,” Jaiswal reasoned.

“We would count on your support in the effort to arrive at a balanced approach that would resolve the contentious issues confronting the stakeholders in different energy sectors.” Describing the MoEF’s argument that difficult blocks have been given to the private operators as “unwarranted”,the minister reminded that the blocks which were identified for allocation for captive use were offered to private players without making any distinction between difficult or easily workable mines. “The very fact that Coal India Limited itself has more than 100 coal projects awaiting Stage-1 or Stage-11 approval for a period of more than 150 days is proof enough to establish that CIL is also facing difficulties similar to the ones being faced by private operators. A majority of these projects are pending for more than three years,” he said.

Story continues below this ad

“The conclusion that you have drawn that difficult blocks have alone been allotted to the private operators is thus unwarranted and I would urge you to appreciate the position described herein and acknowledge that this has not happened by design,” Jaiswal contended. Ruling out the allocation of alternate coal blocks against those falling in the No Go areas as “simply not workable”,the coal minister reminded Ramesh that there was no provision in the extant policy to this effect and also that no equivalent blocks were available as the ones that could have been possible substitutes already stood allocated. “Moreover,the action in making categorization of forest areas applicable retrospectively has resulted in introducing considerable uncertainty for many project proponents since in most cases they have made significant progress on tie-ups for the end use plants involving massive investments and facing potentially insurmountable hurdles at this stage is jeopardizing their entire project.”

Arguing that there was no real ground for the MoEF to question the adequacy of the mining plans being approved by his ministry,Jaiswal said these plans were being vetted by the Standing Committee headed by Coal Secretary C Balakrishnan and the panel comprised of eminent domain experts. “You will appreciate that intimating on prior approval from the environmental angle before taking up exploration will only delay matters and worsen the situation,” he argued.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement