Man wins consumer case regarding faulty mobile handset
Related
Top Stories
- Spot-fixing: Petition in SC seeks stay on IPL matches, seeks SIT probe
- India, China call for end to incursion issue, sign 8 deals to boost ties
- Sanjay Dutt spends restless nights as officials yet to decide on his jail
- Aarushi murder case: Rajesh Talwar claims he was asleep when killings took place
- Railgate: BJP protests against CBI DIG for shielding Pawan Bansal
In a complaint about the sale of a faulty Samsung mobile handset that failed to update time automatically, the UT Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum directed the company, its service centre and the electronics shop which conducted the sale to jointly replace the handset or refund the price.
In February 2012, Rajesh Kumar, a resident of Chandigarh, Sector 26, had bought a Samsung Champ Deluxe C 3312 mobile for Rs 3800 from Harish Communications, an electronics shop in Sector 17 which he alleged started developing problems from the following day. He said that it did not update the time on its own. Rajesh complained that he contacted the dealer, who repaired it, but it presented the same problem within two days. He was then advised by the dealer to approach a Samsung service centre, Durga Communication, in Sector 18 for repairs.
The complainant further alleged that despite undergoing repair at the service centre, the mobile had the same problem again and that the defect could not be rectified to his satisfaction, despite repeated visits to the service station. Meanwhile, he said he had written e-mails to the Samsung head office, to which he received the reply that the handset had been repaired and that it could be collected from the service centre.
In his complaint, Rajesh pleaded that the handset was defective because within a short period of its purchase it had to be taken to the service centre multiple times for removal of defect and yet it could not be rectified. He further complained that the handset was beyond repair and that the failure on the part of the opposite parties to replace the defective handset amounts to deficiency in service.
In view of the above arguments, the forum directed the the opposite parties to replace the mobile handset with the same make and build within 45 days, failing which they shall have to refund the price of the handset with an added interest of 18 percent per annum from the date of its purchase.
Editors’ Pick
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- If found guilty, BCCI to ask ICC to erase Sreesanth records
- Top cops among 42 named in death of blast accused
- Manmohan-Li talks: PM takes tough line on incursion issue
- Security forces blame Maoists, villagers say CoBRA man was killed in 'friendly fire'
- Travellers’ nightmare: Yellow fever vaccine stocks run out, production unit awaits repair


Life of Pi singer Bombay Jayashri to perform in Chandigarh
Theories of Sino-India war far-fetched, says ex-Army chief
HC rejects Punjab plea on Bhattal’s govt house
Civic body moots Rs 616-cr budget, discussion today




















