Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Meeting of minds

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In a moment of plain-speaking that is all-too-rare at summits of this sort, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared at the G-20 meeting of finance ministers this weekend that “we are only about halfway through dealing with the causes of the crisis.” Brown’s firmness that the troubles in the international economy that began with the collapse of Lehman Brothers over a year ago are not over is welcome — troubles that have, not too coincidentally, hastened the rise of the

    G-20 as the major location for international co-ordination. That coordination was most on display whenit came to questions of whether it was time to exit the stimulus. There have been calls to do so in many major economies — the US, in particular, has seen some favourable numbers recently. But the release of more nuanced unemployment figures for that country, putting the real jobless rate in excess of 17 per cent, and the continuing struggles of several other members of the G-20 — especially Britain — stiffened the ministers’ spines. The sole exception? India; Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, speaking at the India Economic Forum on Sunday morning, clearly indicated that “next year” India will “wind this down.”

    Ads by Google

    India simply does not have the resources that many other G-20 economies do. Yet stimulus packages should be thought of not just as government spending, but as monetary easing — which should be maintained for the foreseeable future — and reform, which can get production on a high-growth path again. India has much to learn from everyone else’s view of the international economic landscape. It also has much to learn, and painfully little to contribute, to discussions about international capital flows. The growing belief that some sort of “Tobin tax” — a miniscule levy on international short-term flows, used to stabilise international finance — is necessary, found many takers at the G-20. (The US’ Tim Geithner continued to sound unconvinced by the need for reform, though.) India’s stunted financial sector, and its limited openness, means that it should listen more and brag less as these discussions take place.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Screw the developed world!By: Salauddeen | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward What India needs is less govt. and less babudom. Only business of govt. is to provide security and law & order. The people of India are perfectly capable of making free competitive markets - just stop putting barriers in their path! And they have enough savings to fund all their capital needs - no need to let the Wall Street sharks in for a feeding frenzy on Indian savings! Why do you think they want a share of the Indian insurance and pension savings?
    Tragic but trueBy: arun kumar | 09-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward That India must make habit of listening and not brag. The development India has seen in last few years is more on account of individual's success, success of IT sector (inspite of the fact that India is low in list of Consumption) and other services sector. This means we have been able to sell our intellect at much lower prices and than others. The Governments contribution in social, law and order or Public sector has been dismal. Should a Government be in Hotel, airlines or transport industry? Nehru's idea of creating heavy industry in Public sector has been a total failure as these are the real WHITE ELEPHANTS. Thanks to her over 01 billion population which is ready to accept sub standard consumer products for which the impact of Economic Crisis has been minimum. The developed world would care a least what our g8 MMS may have to say - as it is his acceptance is only with his mouth shut.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.