• Fali S. Nariman’s suggestion about an ombudsman over the Supreme Court collegium deserves to be examined by the government in the light of judicial reforms and the P.D. Dinakaran furore. His observation about the role played by caste is serious; and it’s only the character and moral fibre of a judge that can save the day. Caste plays a predominant role in Indian society in every sphere of life. Bench-hunting is resorted to by clients or their advocates to help the case. Many factors and considerations are weighed in. But isn’t it difficult to ignore merit always? Should merit not be given statutory force, with proper safeguards, to avoid embarrassing situations?

— R.K. Mahajan

New Shimla

Clear the air

• This refers to ‘Courting scrutiny’ . The ongoing controversy about reported allegations by senior lawyers against P.D. Dinakaran’s elevation to the SC doesn’t augur well for the higher judiciary. Since the SC collegium comprises of eminent jurists of the highest calibre and unquestionable integrity, it may like to make a discreet inquiry at its own level in this case and the proposed nomination of Justice Dinakaran may be kept on hold pending an outcome. This will clear the air. However, Fali Nariman’s suggestion regarding an independent ombudsman to examine complaints against SC and high court judges, also merits consideration.

— Anjana Gupta

Delhi

Loud and dangerous

• This refers to the editorial ‘Watch him’. Communal elements, violently propagating their agendas, have generally gained undesirable support from the like-minded. Unfortunately, our law and order machinery has often ignored them as insignificant. That’s how Raj Thackeray’s MNS gained ground; or, earlier, outfits like the Shiv Sena and Bajrang Dal were formed. An indifferent administrative approach has proved harmful to society in the long run.

... contd.