Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Mine, mine

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Iron Man, we know, is a profitable superhero franchise that has been re-imagined several times over, to suit the changing times. India’s own Iron Man, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, is turning out to be a pretty malleable cultural icon, made over by the BJP and fought for by the Congress.

    Patel, that doughty crusader for a unified India, would be entirely surprised at the kind of political war raging over him. BJP politicians from L.K. Advani to Narendra Modi like to trace their genealogy back to him — in the popular imagination, he combines a tough-guy image with an inflexible nationalism and cultural conservatism. His legendary differences with Jawaharlal Nehru make it easier to pitch Patel as the man whose vision the Congress failed to understand, and for the BJP to appropriate. Patel, of course, can no longer protest this ahistorical hostile takeover of his image. After the flap over Jaswant Singh’s book, the Gujarat government rushed to ban it, citing injury to Patel’s reputation — “he is considered the architect of the modern India, no one can show him in bad light.” They had to climb down from that position after court orders, but Modi soldiers on in the effort to wrest Patel’s legacy. Meanwhile, the Congress has belatedly learnt to guard its turf — sanctioning Rs 17 crore to spruce up the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel National Memorial in Ahmedabad and lavish attention on Patel through a book and artwork.

    Ads by Google

    Modi stole the thunder, claiming that Sardar Patel should have been India’s first prime minister. He freely fantasised: had Sardar Patel been the first prime minister of the country, farmers would not have committed suicide in Karnataka and Maharashtra. There would have been no terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir. He also hit the Congress where it hurts, claiming that Patel had predicted the Chinese threat, writing to Jawaharlal Nehru in 1950 and asking him to revise defence policy. Sonia Gandhi hit back, saying that to “claim that there were unbearable disagreements between Sardar Patel and Pandit Nehru is to distort history.” And indeed, despite their well-known differences, there was no personal animus between Patel and Nehru — Sardar Patel remained a Congress anchor till the end. But then again, historical fact is hardly likely to get in the way of Modi’s grandiose self-fashioning project.

    IE biasedBy: shanthanu | 05-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward After reading so many opinions condemning the Indian Express I thought they would grow intelligent at least not to openly exhibit to invite further disgrace.
    SONIA REMEMBERS SARDARBy: NAVIN ASTI | 04-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. Gupta!Keeping away your assignment with Anti-Hindu NDTV and your love(for obvious reasons)for Congress,if you don't cheat your concious,then you have to agree that GREAT SARDAR PATEL was done injustice by Nehru and his dynasty.Today's journalism(especially English ones) has been so bias that even good work and factual words of Mr.Modi become subject of your criticism.We are able to see the then brave IE changed to today's level.
    Belated flummeries.By: Dr.R.K.D.Goel | 03-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The RSS was banned by Sardar Patel is true. But the same Sardar also praised the RSS. To day in BJP only selfish persons have entered those did no sacrifice for Mother Bharat Mata. They came to BJP to eat cream and now when they show that the BJP is sinking ship they are leaving the BJP as rats leave the sinking ship. There is no patriotic person in BJP. Those were the RSS Pracharak of old time RSS may be relied that they are to see Bharat Glory otherwise majority have enter BJP for selfish motoves to loot the Party funds by all mean. We may only say Modi is the real RSS worker who will never deceive Bharat Mata.
    Bias Indian ExpressBy: Prasad | 03-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward What can we expect from Shekhar Gupta of the express who spews venom on Modi day in and day out ? Congress pays him to dio that but Modi is fast emerging as a key political player to watch out for whether IE likes him or not.
    HISTORICAL "FACTS"By: YAGNESWARAN | 03-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The editorial wing of IE should make it clear on the criteria’s they adopt to arrive at what are Historical "Facts" and what not? It is doubtful if anything like Historical "Facts" does exist. History is after all a consensus by powerful groups (political or otherwise) on what happened in the past written to promote their interests. Had Congress, Right and Left ruled independent India for roughly the same length Indian History would definitely have had a different complex. Indian Express cheerfully demonised Pragya Singh Thakur and when SIT subsequently cleared her of terrorist tag newspapers like yours and self proclaimed seculars mischievously went silent. It is this kind of things that go into the writing of history. After all it makes a lot of business sense for you to demonise Narendra Modi.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.