Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Missed in translation

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In a sense Kunwar Narain comes from a tradition of literature, which while it shared a modern scepticism of didacticism, did not wholly give up on the deeply transformative potential of art. It did not allow the romance of the fact to sideline deep questions about moral psychology, the nature of the self, questions of value, and transcendence. As a new sense of moral vertigo, disorder and confusion descend upon us, it is an open question: what kind of literature will enrich us most? But we will not be in a position to make those choices if we cling to an avoidable mono-lingualism, and a set of narrow standards to judge what is truly important.

    The writer is president, Centre for Policy Research, Delhi

    express@expressindia.com

    Previous1234
    kamayani by jaishankar prasadBy: myron nahum | 25-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward I have been shocked to find that the summary of the storyof the above classic is not available anywhere.All sites,as your one is, are intersted in advertisements and speeches but completely unaware of such serious lapses.Regards.
    HiBy: Kaushik | 27-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Interesting article. I feel Hindi has lost out because of the following points:1. It is not a very fluid language. In that sense, it is worse than Samskrt which it tries to replace. Samskrt has a scientific, classical aura which Hindi lacks.2. Lack of abundant and good quality literature.3. The forcible imposition of Hindi by making it a national language (esp so in South India where it tried to overpower the classical and beautiful Thiamizh and the deep rooted Kannada and Telugu) has caused severe problems beyond the realm of language or art. India, primarily, should keep away from the idea of having a single national language. Language cannot force unity / identities. What is said using the language can.4. Lack of education in the "Hindi" belt - This is the probable cause of point 2, if you discredit point 1.5. Without tatsam (Samskrt words used directly in Hindi) words, hindi sounds poor and is not very pleasing to the ears.
    Response to Mr. KaushikBy: Durgesh K Rai | 11-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward This is a response to Kausik who seems either a confused north-indian elite or a firm believer of "cassical and buetiful" Thiamizh. Dear Mr. Kausik although i partially aggree and largelly disagree with you on your most of the observations on degradation of the Hindi language, I strongly disagree with you on your observation that Hindi lacks abundant and good quality literature.I feel you just lack even basics about the language you are commenting onpon. If you can, please read just one or two authors like Jaishankar Prasad, Ageya, Nagarjun to name few, i am sure you will realise the quality and deepness of the language.Hope to see your response.RegardsDurgesh
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.