Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Mixed message

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Whatever message the stockmarkets may appear to give, Friday’s credit policy statement was not entirely unexpected. It announced no further changes in the interest rates or in the cash reserve ratio of banks. But this came after sharp cuts in both these instruments in the last few days. With these measures having had an impact and having brought down inter-bank call money rates, it is now time for the RBI to watch the liquidity situation before announcing any further liquidity enhancing measures. When seen in conjunction with the speed with which the RBI has reacted in the last few days, the credit policy indicates that steps will be taken as required. The markets reacted negatively, but news of UK’s GDP decline and weak markets in Europe played a significant role in pulling the Sensex down almost 11 per cent.

    However, more should have been done in the policy. The lack of action should have been backed by a strong and clear direction of monetary policy, one that should have turned the focus away from managing future inflation, already declining, to maintaining future growth, which is also coming down. This change is not clear. As a consequence, for example, the policy statement is not sufficient to lead to a reduction in bank lending rates. The policy statement expresses concern over the growth of bank credit at 29 per cent, even though bank credit for the petroleum sector — that has grown by 91 per cent as oil companies have turned to banks for loans — is responsible for a large element of this. The statement says that the RBI would like to see the growth of non-food credit, including investments in bonds/debentures/shares of public sector undertakings and private corporate sector and CP, reduce to around 20 per cent. If the RBI is going to work towards reducing credit growth it is not a signal to banks to reduce lending rates. Also, as long as the liquidity situation in the money market gets affected by the RBI’s sale of dollars, which sucks out rupees and can create tight liquidity conditions any day, not many banks are feeling reassured that the easing is here to stay.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Mixed MessageBy: Salim Ambar Inamdar | 26-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward We are presently faced with a crisis whose contours are not yet clear. Making sure that there is no dearth of liquidity is top priority for RBI right now. However that can't be the sole concern of the central bank. In the quest to flush the markets with liquidity RBI cannot allow banks to overstretch themselves by lending to entities which are vulnerable in the present times of worldwide financial meltdown. The RBI is therefore justified in being cautious and not cutting rates after the sharp cuts during the previous weeks. Also it is dangerous to give banks a carte blanche to go on a lending spree by cutting rates or to allow bankrupt businesses to remain aflaot a liltle longer by accessing cheap credit. It is prudent to wait and watch and caliberate our response in accordance with the unfolding situation. RBI's ambuguity might just be of help in these times when temperance is the need of the hour and not foolhardy aggression.
    Stranglehold of elections.By: Chandran Nair | 26-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward My humble opinion also is on the lines of reader 'Sunil', seen here. The best example of government's unbudgeted splurge was in regard to oil. Apart from the export oriented private refiners and sellers of periferral products like lubes, the entire refining/marketing is done by PSU's. So, when the Co's were left to accumulate losses, swallow subsidies themselves, or turn to bonds, these were dovetailing to the govt! The weight of economics factoring on such 'wishing away' style was evident in the govt stopping in its path of raising oil prices simply because of a letter from Sonia Gandhi! The monstrous pay commission largesse, already a large wound, shall turn septic, thanks to festering monetary markets around. Unless we loosen up the tension of vote hunt strangling pragmatic applied economics, total distortion will result. In my view, 'the brilliant reformist team' s credit for the leap is much less than the irrepressible Indian entrepreneurs', avoid scrambling things, be sensible !
    Mixed messageBy: sunit | 25-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Let this not happen that the team that led India into the spectacular economic recovery in the early 90s would drag it down in this last part of the decade. With substantial un-budgeted spending to gain short term popularity in this election year, the Government is cutting the branch it is sitting on. The impact of pay commission largesses will be much much more than what has been reckoned after the states increase their own salary budgets, They will come to the centre to be rescued shortly. The rupee depreciation will affect oil imports sooner or later. No measures seem to be taken to reduce Govt. spending. Nothing much is done to reduce the effect of the parallel economy of black money. Corruption levels are increasing in every conceivable area. It is high time that the top level A team swings into action in a realistic and practical way without bothering about vote bank politics.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.