Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

MoD clears IAF’s rules of engagement with Naxals

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has ruled out an offensive or proactive role for the Indian Air Force in anti-Naxalite operations but has laid down clear-cut recommendations for operations: IAF helicopters should be fitted with light machine guns, pilots should be equipped with personal weapons including INSAS rifles, and there should be least one commando on board to counter fire from Naxals.

    Government sources told The Sunday Express that the IAF mandate for anti-Naxal duties has been limited to troop deployment and casualty evacuation, with emphasis on “proportional response” in case the Mi-17 helicopters come under fire from Maoists.

    The principles of engagement and the Standard Operating Procedure for the IAF will be sent to Air Headquarters next week after consultations with the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) with Defence Minister A K Antony giving the final go-ahead.

    Ads by Google

    Earlier, as first reported by The Indian Express, Air Chief P V Naik had sought permission from the Defence Ministry to fire at Maoists in case IAF helicopters were attacked. Official sources said the MoD’s view is that while the IAF could respond to Naxal fire, the response should be “calibrated with little or no collateral damage to civilians.”

    So the light machine gun will be inside the helicopter rather than being mounted on it to avoid any provocation. The need for an LMG, an area weapon, has arisen because of the Maoists upgrading their weapons from antique .303 rifles to rocket launchers, AK-47s and machine guns.

    Cynicism does not help, but Govt needs to open its eyes even wider than now and actBy: Surekh Reghunathen | 02-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Dear MT,it is very easy to be cynical about such reports.If India proactively uses her own armed forces against these people,it would be admission to the world that India has an enemy in her hinterland.She will then be accused of turning against her own citizens.It will equivalent to setting the lion against the wild cat.This is a tight ropewalk.It is true that democracy does have such pitfalls where the so-called villains get rosy treatment but it is still better than the authoritarian alternative.However, the actions of the Maoists cannot be justified as they are challenging the mandate of elected Governments in those states.A twin strategy of addressing both short-term and long-term problems must be taken up.Give those poor villagers and tribals a better deal. Ask them what they want instead of dictating preconcieved ieas of progress to them and fulfil their needs. At the same time, nip any extremism from the bud itself. Show no quarter to those who take up the law in their hands.
    Talk to them, address their issues related to social injustice By: riya | 01-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Don't use Army or IAF for these poorest of the poor people of India. Address their issues of social injustice, and development. Talk to them w/o any condition.
    yes wait for few copters to crash and live of jawans and forces go firstBy: MT | 01-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Seems like, the MOD will wait for few copters to crash and live of jawans and forces go first, before changing this rule.Hopefully, the Naxals will also reciprocate by not firing at helicopters... like in Mahabharata, when sankh sound was blown after evening to stop the from dusk to dawn.This is the greatness of democracy, when anti nationals are given cushion for their fight. Development can be done even after eradicating the Naxals who do not want to join the mainstream, however one can argue, that the masters of the democracy are themselves corrupt neck deep.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.