Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Modern India’s modern myths

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    It is my belief that the first column of a New Year should try to be cheerful no matter how bad the times. So, despite the attempt to bump off our new Home Minister in Guwahati on New Year’s Day I am not going to say more than one sentence about terrorism this week. Here is that sentence. May the attempt to assassinate him make Shri P. Chidambaram realise that no amount of national investigative and policing agencies will make any difference if ordinary policemen remain untrained and under-equipped and if intelligence gathering at the level of the local police station remains as abysmal as it is across India.

    Now for something cheerful. As someone who loathes the self-loathing writers, historians, hacks and politicians who became such a noisy chorus in the international media after the attack on Mumbai, I want to have fun this week demolishing their myths about India. The first of these myths is that India itself is a myth. The Mahabharata and the Ramayana are myths that were written by men who lived in a place without geography or history. Sanskrit came from this same nebulous arena as did the Vedas and the mathematicians who invented the zero.

    Ads by Google

    The idea of India did not exist until the British created it is the contention of India’s self-loathing ‘liberals’. In the words of a historian of recent celebrity, India is an ‘unnatural nation as well as an unlikely democracy’. He does not bother to explain what he means by ‘unnatural nation’ since the nation state itself did not exist till not very long ago. Long, long before that there was a country called Bharat whose borders were clearly defined and whose certainty continues to be perfectly understood by ordinary Indians across India.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Bharat v/s IndiaBy: Shashank Vagal | 03-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Thanx for info. But, it was MahaPanditChanakya who first fostered the idea of building one big nation (not the British per se) unifying the so called Ganas at that time. I am not sure what name it had. Bharatvarsh is old popular name for our country in Puranas and other such scriptures. And Chandragupt did work it out that way to a very great extent. It was Samrat Ashok, the great who got confused with gains (or losses as he saw it) of victory after the Kalinga war. I am in full agreement with you on those pseudo-Pandits of the new times when they air about any possible thing under the sky related to our country. As regards the introduction of English as educational medium language with support from Raja Ram Mohan Roy et al; I wish to share with you observations of Veer Savarkar: If we had chosen Sanskrit (another given option, too) instead of English, India would be a one gr8 united country-all other languages would merge in it easily. see what advantages we would have thereby?
    Most appropriate articleBy: Sunil Sahadev | 03-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Dear tavleen,this is one of the best peices I have ever read. Something which I wanted to shout at our 'self-loathing leftist intelligentia. Apart from the Bharat India, that you mentioned which was once ruled by emporers like Samudragupta, ashoka, and Chandragupta Manurya, Whose adminstrative boundaries were almost as big as the present India (look at the spread of Asoka stupas in India), Even Mughal India was a single big country that was even bigger than the present India. Though Aurangazedb was a crueal dictator, you should consider the fact that his India comprised of the present india, Pakisthan , Afghanisthan and Bangladesh put together. THe southern most tip of his India extendet to the present day Madurai and the Northern most tip to kashmir. All these states were ruled by Governers appointed by the ruler. I am open to be challenged by any Historian and Aurangazeb ruled INdia for about 50 odd years. SO much for the articifial nation theory
    Modern Indian mythBy: Pradeep | 11-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward You are right madam. The vast left wing establishment seeks India's destruction. Barkha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai and Arundhati Roy have managed to inflict more damage than LeT
    Wage a War on Intellectual terrorismBy: ram shankar | 11-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Kudos to you ,Tavleen Singh.You and Swami Ram Dev should wage a war against theseso called intellectuals and torch bearers of Secularism and create one confident and assured India
    Ms. Singh is rightBy: Sam | 09-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward India is an unfortunate nation which is represented by people who are anti-nationals. Nowhere else in the world do it see the majority community undergoing so much abuse. The majoirity community in India is hopelessly divided along caste and linguistic lines and India is weak as a nation primarily becuse of this reason.We are led by 'anti-national secularists' at all levels and for them anything hindu is communal.ONLY SOLUTION FOR US IS TO UNITE AS A COMMUNITY BUT CAN WE? I HOPE SO.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.