The primary note of caution for Sibal is to not rush in, least of all with the single board. The proposals must be thought through and analysed in perspective, and dissociated from the breathlessness of a 100-day rhetoric. While education needs a largescale overhaul, leaping from inactivity or useless activity (as under Sibal’s predecessor) to hyper-activity will not help. One only needs to imagine the problem-ridden CBSE turning into the proposed national board to understand the dangers involved. Still, caution is not scepticism, and Sibal should embark on revolutionising education, and do so by broadening the national debate.