Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

More than numbers

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • When Nandan Nilekani was invited to take up a government assignment, there was considerable scepticism in many quarters, and justifiably so. Our government has what is known as the “reverse-Midas touch” — the ability to convert gold into lead. Think of so many government initiatives in the history of free India. Do you remember the Community Development Project of the fifties? After five decades and the appointment of thousands of BDOs (block development officers), how many parts of rural India have indeed “developed” (whatever that may mean)? Do you remember Garibi Hatao, the magic slogan some forty years ago? At last count India had the maximum number of “garibs” in the world. So will the same fate await the Unique ID Project — good intentions, tall talk and abysmal delivery leading to cynicism all around? This is a legitimate fear and our track record as a country does not lead to much optimism.

    And yet, the other day as a couple of dozen of us came away from a meeting with Nandan’s team, we were looking at each other, nodding our heads and saying with a mixture of awe, admiration, hope and tautened expectation something along the following lines: “Their plans are intriguing — modest at one level and therefore eminently do-able, simply breathtaking in its audacity at another level and therefore absolutely desirable from the country’s point of view.” The new Agency is not planning to issue a card as most of us have been thinking. In one utterly brilliant stroke, they have redefined the purpose and the outcome of their endeavour. Each Indian resident is going to be eligible for a single Unique ID Number, not a card. This means that others who issue cards, be it in the state sector (the Election Commission, the passport office, the NREGA authority, the Income Tax Department, etc) or in the private sector (banks, cell phone operators, etc) have nothing to fear and therefore no incentive to resist or sabotage the new approach. On the contrary, they are free (as and when they choose — no compulsion) to leverage the fact that there will be a unique number associated with a unique individual — a symmetric relationship which cannot be violated or subverted as it will be based on non-replicable biometrics. Leveraging this facility can only help various card-issuers and if they choose not to make use of the unique IDs they are no worse off than they are today.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Unique IDBy: Ramadas | 30-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Once everyone is given a unique ID, a bank account and an ATM card too should be issued. Imagine everyone using ATM cards for everyday purchases or any kind of transactions, paper currency use will be greatly reduced and the business of counterfeit notes will meet its natural death. It will also enable to track the distribution of government funds meant for the poor.
    Yet another ID that serves lessBy: G.K | 12-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward One has Passport, PAN, Voter Id, Postal ID (do we know one such exists), Identification in Ration card and s/he is going to have one more ID (that too number only), seems every wing/dept/agency of govt had facied to have one "nation-wide" identifier. UID's purposes? If one goes by the author, it is not clear as it seems to be voluntary, for "residents", hence it is of less use. I understand it is being shaped like United State's SSN. So if the "residents" are indeed further classified as citizen-by-birth, naturalisation, others, etc then it will have some purpose served. Also, Postal ID is non-intrusive but none of the other agencies, including Banks, admit them as proof of existence and residence. So UID's utility, after massive spent (anything in govt. be it simple looking or otherwise is one and only massive spent), should not be as redundant as Postal IDs (for that matter Postal ID is less spent on govt. exchequer as its paid-by-user id and short-living).
    paternal libertarianism and the robber stateBy: Arvind S | 07-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward this non-compulsory, paternal libertarian scheme is going to be no match for the robber political class. They will coninue to fleece the nation - the only hope is it will make transacting with govt easier for those getting a passport or paying taxes. However as Swaminomics has noted (on another paper's site) - you annot robber-proof anything in India
    Comparision with Moon landing: BAD By: Sarat | 07-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward You must be kidding if you compare this project to the Apollo moon landings. We are supposed to just trust the author on the technical merits??? What is the scientific progress achieved through this project? This is just a giant logistical challenge but all the technological issues are already solved. There may be some IT kinks that need to be worked out but certainly nothing comparable to the challenges faced by NASA during the moon landings. Even the biometric challenges you speak of are solved and some are not even as secure or foolproof as you may think. This is just a bad comparision.
    The same old storyBy: Girija | 06-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Jerry - aren't you doing the same old mistake that you alluded to in the beginning of your article? The fact that this is a number- not a card and that too voluntary both in obtaining the number and using it in multitude of cards dilutes the project to unimaginable levels. The issue is not in issuance - be it card or or a number. That's the easy part. T N sheshan got half of India voters Ids in less than a year. The issue is in usage and that's where you can't get away by conciliatory approaches. It needs to be taken head on and of course requires political will and commitment. For example - consider the NREGA project - do you think that the gram panchayat or whoever is the body leading that, would like to use the UID for disbursing the funds that they would rather steal? Would the Banks in cahoots with upcoming Harshad Mehta's impose this requirements on their customers and lose revenue? The writing is already on the wall for this project - like it or not!!!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.