Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
Search
You are here: IE »   Story

MPs point to ‘intervention’ by courts, will debate role of state organs

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • A day after the Supreme Court ruled that no official sanction was needed to prosecute public servants for corruption, Lok Sabha MPs raised the issue of “interventions by the judiciary” and Speaker Somnath Chatterjee agreed to allow a discussion soon on the functioning of the legislature, judiciary and the executive.

    The decision came after MPs, led by CPI’s Gurudas Dasgupta, demanded a discussion in the form of a calling attention motion and Chatterjee sought the opinion of the House. With agreement on the need for a debate, the Speaker converted the motion into a discussion, to be taken up later.

    Calling a written reply by Law Minister Hansraj Bharadwaj “a lame-duck statement”, Dasgupta said the Constitution warranted that the three organs of the state did not “act in an arbitrary way” but “of late, there have been interventions by the judiciary”.

    “Even legislative intentions are being subjected to judicial scrutiny,” Dasgupta said, citing three instances — summons to the Speaker, a monitoring committee to oversee sealing in Delhi and the observation in a Tamil Nadu case that there should not be a strike.

    Express Specials
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.