Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

RIL files caveat in SC against ex parte judgment

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Mukesh Ambani
    RIL filed a caveat in SC to ensure it is given a chance to explain itself in a case relating to natural gas supply to RNRL.

    Mukesh Ambani-run Reliance Industries filed a caveat in the Supreme Court to ensure it is given a chance to explain itself in a case relating to natural gas supply to Anil Ambani group firm RNRL.

    RNRL earlier moved the apex court seeking modification of the Bombay High Court ruling that suggested firming up gas supply contract through negotiations.

    When contacted, an RIL spokesperson confirmed filing the caveat against an ex parte judgment.

    RIL had earlier talked about filing appropriate proceedings in the Supreme Court against the judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court on June 15, 2009.

    The High Court had ruled that RNRL should get gas from RIL at a price of USD 2.34 per mmbtu, but had asked the two companies to firm up an agreement on related issues within a month.

    Mukesh Ambani files caveat in supreme court regarding gas price against AnilBy: N.Sivsubramanian | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward i dont understand why brothers are fighting unnecessarily themselves. are they having any tamasha (for fun) for the saking of getting publicity from people and media or are they really fighting among themselves. how they have amassed wealth within a short span of time, after the demise of the founder of the group? are they really paying taxes to the govt at all or never paying. previously during nehru days, parliament used to announce who are owing taxes to the govt (particularly big business houses like birlas, tatas, etc. nowadays we dont know who owed taxes to the govt or whether arrears of taxes are being paid or not. think congress is supporting ambanis, on reciprocal basis
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.