Mainstream left-wing parties in India have generally worked with the classical notion of secularism and have rarely resorted to the language of minorityism or communalism in electoral politics. As elsewhere in the world, they are broadly guided by Marxist social philosophy that emphasises ‘class’ and other economic divisions in society. In other words, their politics has been ‘community and religion blind’. They see any invocation of ascriptive identities as divisive and sectarian, not only because such politics violates the secular character of the Indian Constitution, but also because invocations of caste and communal identities divide the working classes who, for them, are the potential agents of revolutionary struggles.

Why, then, has the Communist Party of India (Marxist) suddenly become a champion of the Muslim cause? No one, not even the ruling Congress party, seems to be taking the Sachar Committee Report on the ‘development deficit’ in the Indian Muslim community as seriously as the CPM is doing. Interestingly, it was not on the insistence of the Left allies of the ruling front that the prime minister appointed the Sachar Committee. Even more importantly, the report produced by the committee portrays the Left-ruled state of West Bengal in a rather poor light. As the data given in the report shows very clearly, Muslims of West Bengal are among the worst off in the country. In contrast, Gujarat fares much better.

How should one, then, understand the turnaround in the Left’s attitude on the Muslim question? Does it indicate a shift towards a politics of vote-bank in the CPM, or have they found a new proletariat in the Indian Muslim? Is it a simple case of scoring another point over the Congress in the competitive field of electoral politics?

... contd.