Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Muslims should honour Hindu sentiments on Ram Temple: Seer

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Shankaracharya of Dwarka Peeth, Swami Swaroopanand Sarswatiji Maharaj, has appealed to the Muslim community to honour the religious sentiments of Hindus and cooperate in the construction of Ram Temple at Ram Janambhoomi in Ayodhya.

    "Ram Temple at the birth place of Lord Ram is one of the holiest places for Hindus as Mecca for Muslims and Vatican for Christians," Swaroopanand Sarswatiji told newspersons here last night.

    Temples and Masjids can be built at any place but the birthplace (of Lord Ram) cannot be shifted, he said while emphasizing for a concrete step to end the dispute over the issue.

    He said the issue should be resolved in a cordial atmosphere without disturbing the prevailing communal harmony. Taking a dig at BJP, the Shankaracharya said the Ram Mandir issue was grabbed from the Sadhus and the issue was forgotten by them. The Shankaracharya also expressed concern over the rampant pollution in the Ganges river.

    Ads by Google

    Islam grew from a Holy Prophet and rests (all Converted) after learning this God (Creator)By: Z_M | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Monotheism Muslim God existed before universe earth in present form existed.He is first last and creator. As for Reference to Mecca Kaaba it was built by Monotheism first Promoter Abraham a would be priest in line to his father Chief priest of Idols Laden Temple. Idols were gods and then live gods of VIP of the society. He broke them all saying %u201CYou cannot workship them or compare them to Creator who created universe and its content%u201D.
    Honour SentimentsBy: S Kumar | 08-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward I do not think that some intellectuals honour Hindu sentiments. When the Time of india called the "Kumbh mela" mere superstition once some years ago, what do you expect. All the Columnists in the various national newspapers are anti-hindu and will just bash the BJP. I think PC went too far then he visited Deoband. Deoband is the root cause of Muslim backwardness and obscurantism in India. Speak to the Barelwis - they are the real moderates. It is deobandi that resists all reform, whether on Triple Talaq, womens education the veil etc. Deoband was sent up in the 1860's by Wahhabi orientated Muslim's who felt that Islam in India had picked up too many cultural customs from other religions. They were agianst Partition because they feared Pakistan would become a modern state. (Since General Zia Ul Haq was a Deobandi - pakistan has regressed backwards). Congress has made a colossal mistake by siding with them ie in the khilafah movement etc and since 1947 for votes
    You Excellency should have made this appeal before carefully planning demolition of BabriBy: antabadrun | 24-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward That is an illogical and unjust idea after causing huge sufferings, pain, devastation, discredit and loss to the minority Muslims of India since 1992. You bullied the community, destroyed their Masjid with pride, arrogance and against the law. Followed by the destruction you destroyed many other Masjids in Ayodhya itself. You made the Muslims of Ayodhya flee their homes. Later in Bombay you started a huge riot killings scores of innocent Muslims, maimed many and then arrogantly said let the Archaeological survey of India find out the 5000 year old Temple of Rama. You were trying to twist the arms of the judiciary simply because you managed to come to power by using the Babri demolition as the trump card. You thought that you could deceive the Indian Hindu voters indefinitely and stick on to power for ever., But Ishwara(one Almighty God of the entire humanity and the Lord of the world) has given a different judgment. You should have made this appeal before thinking about demolition.
    go beore 1857By: V A Patel | 23-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward When Hindu n Muslim united for freedom from british but failed british made false history to divide two communities in 1857 Babar was not even travelled Ayodya he had ruled only 4 years has any body read Babarnama Ramayan n Mahabharata r traditionally living not as history written fact if we make temple on the site there about 3000 tructures n more more troubles do we like that let it be the sme for 100 years or so n our future generation will decide he issue
    Just a moment before you slap!By: Anand | 23-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward I think 'Secular Shariat Rules' is the key phrase in Mr. Natarajan's comment. Please take it in the right spirit.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.