Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Natwar’s endgame: he goes after the PM, finds takers outside Cong

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Natwar, on his part, chose not to admit that he had moved a notice.

    “I will make no statement till I see the report which I am told will be tabled in Parliament tomorrow,” he told reporters outside his residence.

    Rajya Sabha chairman Bhairon Singh Shekhawat’s office was considering the admissibility of Natwar’s privilege notice under Rule 188. Confirming that the notice had been received, a senior Rajya Sabha official said: “We have asked for details. We are trying to ascertain whether the leakage before the report was tabled in Parliament violates rules of procedure and conduct. The final decision will be taken by tomorrow morning.”

    CPI to SP to AIADMK: We are with Natwar

    Natwar moves privilege notice against PM over Pathak report “leak”

    Cong’s P R Dasmunsi says “absolute act of indiscipline”

    Ads by Google

    UPA ally CPI backs Natwar, Bardhan says “leak” is a fact

    CPM’s Sitaram Yechury says “leakage ought not to have happened”, merits privilege notice

    Amar Singh says SP, TDP, AIADMK with Natwar, 33 MPs will bring similar notices

    BJP-led NDA says will also move privilege notices against PM in both Houses

    Previous123

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.