Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Neighbourliness

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As with Mumbai, the demographics of many other Indian cities has radically altered. In Delhi, for instance, the original inhabitants of the walled city were swamped by the flood of Punjabi refugees who arrived after Partition. And in the last three decades, the city’s demography has altered yet again. Similarly, the original Haryanvi farmers of Gurgaon have long been outnumbered by lakhs of new apartment dwellers, who see themselves as living in a suburb of Delhi.

    A country’s prosperity and progress depends on the synergy of its people. If people are to be confined to the regions where they were born, the very idea of nationhood is lost. It is troubling when irresponsible regional parties whip up chauvinist sentiment and promote an agenda of divisiveness. But it is far more disturbing when the government and the mainstream national parties refuse to take them on. In Maharashtra there is a strange silence from the main leaders in the state. The BJP, which prides itself on its nationalist outlook, does not want to upset its ally, the Shiv Sena. The Congress and NCP have been tacitly encouraging Raj Thackeray in the hope that he will cut into the support base of their main political rival, the Shiv Sena. The state chief minister sends a curious signal at this juncture by demanding that railway entrance examinations be conducted in Marathi. The mainstream parties forget that when one chooses to ride a tiger one runs the risk of being devoured, as was the case in Punjab where the Congress initially promoted the little known Bhindranwale for its own ends. If the regional parties are increasing in clout throughout India it is because of the vacuum created with the rapidly declining status of the national parties.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    NeighbourlinessBy: Shirish | 14-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward (2)It is incorrect even to suggest that Mumbai was made by all (More perhaps by British as the madam would love to say!) except Marathis. Better please read the city's history again. This shows prejudiced view of writer towards Maharashtra / its people
    NeighbourlinessBy: Shirish | 14-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward All Maharshtrians are not Marathas (From Marathwada!)Second, the opposition is not for coming here in Mumbai and Maharshtra's other cities but to adversely impact on the law and order situation and flexing the political muscles. Third, Railway recruitment has been always partial to Marathis - which really caused the beginning of the issue- and of course Chhat Puja. Why is there no transparency in RRB's recruitment? Why very few Marathis are seen recruited in Railways and other central institutes? The skewed rules of employment are required to be changed as they are heavily tilted in favour of Hindi speaking states. (Exceptions are Maharashtra and Gujarat- as no political party can do a damn in South and east against their local interests).
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.