Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Netanyahu gives conditional backing to Palestinian state

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Benjamin Netanyahu
    Israeli PM Netanyahu floats the idea of a separate Palestinian state.

    However, the Palestinians were sceptic and angry. "Netanyahu's remarks have sabotaged all initiatives, paralysed all efforts being made and challenges the Palestinian, Arab and American positions," said Nabil Abu Rdeineh, a close aide to Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas.

    Reacting angrily to Netanyahu's assertions that Palestinian refugees will not be allowed to settle in Israel and undivided Jerusalem will stay its capital, Rdeineh said that "this will not lead to complete and just peace". "Our main demand is the end of the occupation and finding a fair solution for Palestinian refugees and halting settlements. Other details should be resolved in negotiations," he said.

    In Gaza, Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri called the speech "racist" and asked Arab nations to "form stronger opposition". Political analysts said the move was aimed at pleasing the US. The mass-circulated Yediot Aharonot said "Netanyahu's speech was meant for one pair of ears... the ears of (US President) Barack Obama."

    Ads by Google

    However, hardline Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said the speech outlined "the balance between our aspirations for peace and the aspiration for security." Eli Yishai, head of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish Shas party, also said Netanyahu "stressed his commitment to plausible peace and security." Netanyahu vowed that Israel would not build any new settlements and would refrain from expanding existing Israeli settlements in the West Bank but his government must be allowed to accommodate "natural growth" in population in these settlements.

    The hawkish leader has so far been adamant that a settlement freeze is unfeasible and that he would concentrate on strengthening the Palestinian economy, rather than agreeing to their statehood. Netanyahu reiterated that Israel has no desire to control the Palestinian people and declared that both nations should be able to live side by side in peace. "We want both Israeli and Palestinian children to live without war," he said adding, "We must ask ourselves why has peace not yet arrived after 60 years?"

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Whay not allow the thief to keep the stolen things?By: inptilayan | 17-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Part One : Will anybody accept the proposition to allow the thief to decide how much of the stolen things he will return to the owner and how much of the stolen property that he will keep for himself. Netanyahu's ideas are similar to this analogy. This morbid, racist Zionist could not have given this “wonderful” new formula to solve the Palestine issue without the authorisation and support of the bossman called partner--- U.S. Administration>>>>. Who is the boss any way?>>> Obama or Netanyahu? Washington’s subordination to Israel is the biggest mystery in contemporary history considering the fact that the so called pro-Israeli domestic lobby is not all Jewish, Dick Cheney is not a Jew, but he is more Jewish than a Jew when it comes to the matter of supporting Israel’s colonialist policies. Israel has no alternative but to serve as a U.S. military base in the region, but one big difference is that all other military bases comply with the demand of the big boss except Israel.
    Netanyahu Offers the Oldwine in a New CupBy: inptilayan | 16-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward PART TWO: Israel has expanded its settlement with continued U.S. political, military and financial backing( US$ 10 Billion a year, in terms of per capita aid, the highest in the world) Israel now controls 42 percent of the West Bank and Netanyahu says that he will allow a State called Palestine to be formed, but according to his new plan, Israel continues to hold the right continue to build more settlements. This means eventually, Israel which now control 42% , will occupy the entire West Bank pushing the Palestinians out on to the East bank. What a stupidly unjust idea? What he suggests is much worse than the apartheid regime of South Africa. Does anyone know the area where the entity called Palestinian State will be established? By his mutilation, Netanyahu has further undermined the hopes for a peaceful diplomatic settlement by a well designed plot. The terrible consequences of his grand idea are so obvious.
    Netanayahu's Old Wine in a New CupBy: inptilayan | 16-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward PART THREE: There seems to be no alternative for Palestinian Liberation movement to reduce or eliminate the brutal military occupation of Israel except to increase the resistance and raise ratio of retaliatory crimes,killings and the sufferings of the Israelis. This reaction is immoral, not proper, but has it been proper to disregard the far worse sufferings of Palestinians for 62 years with the crucial support of the U.S.? Israel is not a State with an army. The ARMY is the State of Israel. And the Israeli army is the adjunct of the U.S. military force. Israel is the only racist militocracy in the world (after Hitler’s). Forceful occupation and colonization will never ever be permanently successful in 21st Century. Huge Empires rose and fell in history. If might is right all the time, people will lose their faith in God, and more and more will challenge the massively well organized State Terror by powerful nations by counter terror and in the process shedding more innocent blood.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.