Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

New beginnings?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Three developments are imminent, and the House should be alert to them.

    First, the steps which were not just implicit, but explicit in the Nuclear Deal will now commence. In the coming months the country will be under pressure to sign on a slew of follow-up agreements which will freeze the power imbalances of today:
    • The NPT review is scheduled for 2010, and there will be extreme pressure on India to sign up – without being recognized as a Nuclear Weapon State;
    • There will be similar pressure to sign the CTBT – without there being in place an international mechanism of verification;
    • And then to sign the Fissile Material Control Treaty or, if the Treaty is long delayed, to in effect declare adherence to the walls that are going to be prescribed in it – remember that during the Nuclear Deal negotiations, and under the Hyde Act India was told that it must declare a cut-off date for producing fissile material even before the FMCT comes into force. Here also, we will be under pressure to abandon the stand we have hitherto taken: namely, that there must be an internationally controlled, and not a nationally controlled verification mechanism.

    Ads by Google

    The slightest reflection will show that the stance that the verification mechanism must be an international one and not one in the control of one or two countries that have the technology for verification as of now is a substantive and not a semantic one. Today the US does have the ability to verify. But can one rely on it to be even-handed? It has been well-documented, after all, how the US agencies knew for years about the bazaar that A.Q. Khan had set up: they chose to do nothing; indeed, they squashed researchers who had nailed the evidence. Hence, when verification is left to mechanisms that are under the control of – the very few – countries that today have the requisite technical capacity, they will proceed by their convenience.
    • We will also be told to sign the PSI – recall that the PM had himself said that India has reservations about this in its present form.
    • And a much tighter Additional Protocol of the IAEA is also in the works.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext2345
    Back to K G ,school, college and post-doctoral programs!By: P A Kashyap | 26-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward The whole syllabus and methodology to be designed and executed by A Shourie for whoever wishes to contest elections and hold public office. Bit of extra hardwork for him but all reformists have done it since ancient times.Given his commitment and grip over whatever has held us back, it is in country's interest that he accepts this harsh task. Life is not endless, we are all like lighted candles. Split syllabus in tiny pieces and get going, to start with BJP, RSS groups. Now that he has proved his mettle over the years, it is those power-seekers who ruin parties and Put their legs when men like Shourie are about to make a sprint for 100 meters!As always A Shourie is right that it is in times like these that parties in power and those in opposition have to prove worth of their salt!
    read thisBy: siddharth gupta | 20-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward these texts should be made mandatory reading all public schools....instead of wasting time on useless western 'experts', the govt should pay heed to brilliant people like shourie...and the BJP should continuously voice these concerns through the media...
    Trapped in time warpBy: ravi nair | 18-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Not one thought expressed is new. Shourie got his chance. He muffed it. We have not forgotten the corruption, nepotism and communalism of the NDA days. The Bangaru Laxman tape, the Ranjan Bhattacharya parallel government, the sweetheart deals with the Ambanis, to name a few. The BJP is doomed for the next 10 years if it continues to rely on old gits and young jerks.
    replyBy: rajeev | 28-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward it will be more prudent to judge on the basis of right or wrong rather on the basis of new or old else we may mis important lesson to learn on irrelevant consideration our vision should we kept clear
    Are you fool?By: Ramesh | 23-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward How can you blame Arun shourie persoanally for ills of NDA? Only fools can connect corruption with Arun Shourie who is the gem of nation.Our country is fortunate in having people like us.Instead of hounouring him you are indulging in bashing him or what else can be expected from a member of Servants of Sonia Society
    New Beggings?, Very logical article supported by indepth analysisBy: Shrikant Shah | 15-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Why BJP is not using such brilliant studies for enlightening the pepole in general and BJP workers in particular?
    ..By: Ritesh | 07-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward The reason is my friend 90% of our population wont understand his language ( he articulates better in English) and his mannerism (he is more of a backroom hyper intelligent economist rather than a chavanni chor neta).Secondly almost 80% of our population votes on bases of Caste,community, language, region, tribe ,etc..It does not matter to them how clean their public life is or how good they are!!
    A brilliant article, with indepth analysisBy: indian | 27-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward This is a brilliant article from arun shourie, as usual.. The extent and sharpness of details, requires a user to read it atleast twice or thrice to grasp the entire content.I wish, more leaders from the BJP develop their ability to approach issues and analyse critically, like this..
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.