You are here: IE »   Story

New Bill to bring judges’ assets under RTI

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Parliament
    Union Law Ministry will introduce a new Judges (Inquiry) Bill in the coming Session of Parliament.
    Discount UK Shopping

    Ending all speculation over the fate of the Judges (Declaration of Assets and Liabilities) Bill, 2009, the Union Ministry of Law and Justice on Wednesday said it would introduce a new Judges (Inquiry) Bill in the coming Session of Parliament. This Bill would also have a clause making it mandatory for judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts to declare their assets on a regular basis to their respective Chief Justices.

    But, more importantly, Union Home Secretary G K Pillai, who is also the Justice Secretary, on Wednesday told the newly-reconstituted Department-related Parliament Committee on Law and Personnel that the citizens of the country would be able to access details of assets of the judges under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

    As first reported by The Indian Express, having lost face in its failed attempt to introduce the Judges (Declaration of Assets and Liabilities) Bill, which was aimed at preventing any attempt by anybody, including any court or public authority, to access details of assets filed by the judges, the Law Ministry decided to shelve its plan to bring in a standalone legislation on the matter of judges’ assets.

    Ads by Google

    “We have decided to subsume the Judges (Declaration of Assets and Liabilities) Bill, 2009, in the Judges (Inquiry) Bill, minus the clause relating to confidentiality of the assets,” Pillai told members of the Parliamentary panel, which was meeting for the first time since its re-constitution under a new chairperson, Congress leader Jayanthi Natarajan. Pillai also detailed steps taken by the government to make justice accessible to the common man.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    not RTI like By: Vinay | 08-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Again a frightened govt in front of Judiciary - with half a step only.As assets will be declared to respective chief justice only, why can't public get the same info. What happens to right to equality ??if govt is unable to get it into a real RTI , where public members can get this info, if not available on the website itself.They at-least assets of judges whose asset increase by more than the average increase in assets of judges, should be available on the website
    it's not RTI as assets will be declared to respective chief justice onlyBy: Vinay | 08-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Again a frightened govt in front of Judiciary - with half a step only.As assets will be declared to respective chief justice only, why can't public get the same info. What happens to right to equality ??if govt is unable to get it into a real RTI , where public members can get this info, if not available on the website itself.They at-least assets of judges whose asset increase by more than the average increase in assets of judges, should be available on the website
    Judges' asset declarion -Bill to be introducedBy: shanthanu | 08-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward But for the commander all the other officers of the Army of Judges are in favour of declaration of assets. The reservation by the leader is ignored?
    good step..... finally...... but still fingers crossedBy: Raghav | 08-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward excellent step. increasing accountability of judges is the need of the hour......
    Law is above allBy: tpertin | 08-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Enactment of law bringging Judges under the perview of RTI Acts is most wel-come act of the Govt.Pleader of (lawers/judges)law can't ignore law of the land.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.