Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

NHRC asked: probe or no probe into Batla encounter?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to decide whether to follow Lieutenant Governor Tejendra Khanna’s decision against a magisterial inquiry into police encounter deaths, such as Batla House, or stick to its mandatory guideline for an independent probe.

    The court sought NHRC’s response by March 18.

    The division bench led by Chief Justice A P Shah was referring to a revised set of guidelines issued by former Chief Justice of India and NHRC chairperson A S Anand on December 2, 2003, making an independent inquiry into police encounter deaths mandatory.

    Lieutenant Governor (L-G) Khanna had last month refused sanction for a magisterial probe into the September 19, 2008 encounter deaths of Delhi serial blasts suspects Atif Amin and Mohammed Sajid in Batla House, at Jamia Nagar area of South Delhi.

    “If police refer the matter to the L-G, and he takes a decision... do you (NHRC) allow your guidelines to be given a go-by?” the court asked.

    Ads by Google

    On the defensive, the commission submitted that it had kept its inquiry “on hold” as the case was sub judice in the High Court. To this the Bench replied, “The NHRC has already got a machinery to deal with such complaints... we (court) were under the impression that you have already started an inquiry.”

    The Supreme Court had earlier refused to entertain a request for a probe into the encounter. “There are many issues concerned here,” the court said. “We want you to clarify whether your guidelines can be set aside by an executive order.”

    In 2003, Justice Anand had written to the chief minister: “Death during the course of police action is always a cause of concern to a civil society... the police do not have a right to take away the life of a person. If, by his act, the policeman kills a person, he commits an offence of culpable homicide or not amounting to murder, unless it is established that such killing was not an offence under the law.”

    NHRC guidelines
    * Entry in “appropriate register” by police officer in charge
    * When officers of same police station form the encounter team, probe on the deaths should be given to an independent agency, like the state Crime Branch-Criminal Investigation Department (CB-CID)
    * In case police action makes out to be cognizable case of culpable homicide — to be investigated by CB-CID
    * Magisterial inquiry must be held in all cases of death in course of police action. The next of kin of deceased must be associated in such inquiry
    * Prompt prosecution and disciplinary action against delinquent officers found guilty in magisterial enquiry/police probe
    * Question of granting compensation to dependents of the deceased would depend on facts and circumstances of each case
    * No out-of-turn promotion or instant gallantry rewards to be bestowed on officers concerned soon after an encounter
    * A six-monthly statement of all cases of deaths in police action in a state shall be sent by state DGP to NHRC

    (As per NHRC website)

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.