No HC relief for Iranian couple charged with cheating
Related
Top Stories
- Spot-fixing: Chandila was in touch with four sets of bookies, says Delhi Police
- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrives, to hold talks with PM on boundary, water issues
- IPL 2013: Delhi Daredevils crash to defeat, finish last
- Jaganmohan's wife attacks CBI, accuses it of working at Congress behest
- Blast accused death: UP govt seeks CBI probe, FIR against 42 persons
THE Bombay High Court, refusing to rule in favour of an Iranian couple living in the city, in a recent order held that even though they might have been living in India for a long time, it cannot give them any additional rights. The couple, who have been chargesheeted in a cheating case, had challenged restrictions on their employment.
Reza Saboonchi and Simeen Saboonchi claim that they were born and brought up, and married, in Mumbai. According to them, when they were minors, their parents obtained Iranian passports, which were renewed from time to time. Their passports have now been renewed till February 2014. Reza and Simeen are aged 62 and 54 years respectively.
They challenged an order dated November 2, 2011, by which restrictions were put on their employment. The couple argued that on account of the order, they would "lose their daily bread and butter and would be unable to survive without doing any business in India, despite the visa to stay in India".
The Dongri police had booked the couple for cheating in 2009. In connection with the case, they had been directed by an order to remain within the limits of south Mumbai and Mazgaon court. This order was also challenged by them before the High Court.
In its order, a division bench of Justice A M Khanwilkar and Justice A R Joshi said, "The fact that the petitioners are born, brought up, educated, married and settled in Mumbai would not create any higher right in their favour, nor is it open to them to ask for any relief which is contrary to visa restrictions."
The bench noted that even after the two attained majority, they chose to keep renewing their visa and to stay in India.
The couple, through their lawyer Mohsin Shirazi, told the court that they have now filed an application for registration of Overseas Citizens of India as defined in the Citizenship Act, 1955. The court, however, ruled that the case can only be decided on the basis of the present status of the two Iranians.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- Quake-hit and shaken, Bhaderwah spends nights in the open
- UP blast accused dies on way to jail, govt wanted to drop case against him
- Former civil aviation secy changes mind, seeks airport security exemption as EC
- BCCI suspects Gujarat players in other teams were also approached
- Police on money trail, Sreesanth in fresh trouble
- Chhattisgarh 'encounter' leaves 8 villagers dead, no Maoist link yet
- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrives today, PM to seek early revival of border talks


Campus placements: IIT Bombay targets 100 companies in phase-II
‘Babasaheb Ambedkar a prisoner of caste politics, his relevance will grow’: Bharip Bahujan Mahasangh president Prakash Ambedkar
From anger to anguish
We deal with birth and death daily, but some deaths leave a void, say doctors



















