No intention to interfere in legislative powers: SC
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- India, China have wisdom to address bounday issue: Li Keqiang
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
Underlining that it had not meddled with the legislative powers, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said the State and its authorities were working with a "mental block" over its verdict on appointment of judicial persons as information commissioners.
A Bench of Justices A K Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar observed that its September verdict had not touched upon the powers of the legislature to appoint members to the central and state information commissions. "We have only said that whenever a judicial member is to be appointed, you (government) consult the Chief Justice of India or Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, as the case may be. And then your consultation process can go on as per your own legislation. You are working with a mental block," said the Bench while hearing a review petition, preferred by the Centre against its verdict.
Some other parties like the Rajasthan government, former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi and RTI activist Aruna Roy have also impleaded themselves in the case.
Hearing Rajasthan government's arguments against the verdict on the court's alleged attempt to legislate by this judgment, the Bench said the Centre took three months to file a review plea while they could have also amended the legislation in the meantime.
While ruling that "only" serving and retired judges of the apex court and chief justices of high courts can head the central and state information commissions, the Bench had directed the Centre to amend the RTI Act in this regard.
"What makes you think that we have taken it upon ourselves to legislate? We have said in the judgment that thee pro-term measures shall act till the time the government frames a legislation. So we have left it on the legislature only," it said.
The "moot question", the court said, was to ensure complete independence of the information commissioners as well as guaranteeing protection of fundamental rights of the citizens by striking a balance between RTI on one hand and right to privacy etc on the other.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks




Salman Khurshid behind US airport detention: Azam Khan
Former mayor to file PIL against Mamata's 'smoke more' remark
Exit BJP's Reddy brothers, enter Cong's own miner
Miffed Akhilesh gets New York Consulate reception cancelled


















