Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

No minister called up Madras High Court judge, says CJI Balakrishnan

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Balakrishanan
    Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan.

    Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan said that no minister had called up Madras High Court judge R Reghupathy. A controversy had erupted following a reported disclosure by the judge that a Union minister had tried to influence him in a case.

    Asked if the judge or anybody else had told him the name of the minister who had allegedly called up the judge to influence him to grant bail to a doctor-son duo in a fake mark-sheet case filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Justice Balakrishnan said: “No minister had called the judge. That is my information. It seems that one lawyer claimed that some minister was interested in the case. Then the judge told the lawyer that he was not interested in knowing if any minister was interested or not. The judge has written a letter to the Chief Justice (of the Madras High Court) and he is sending it to me.”

    Ads by Google

    While the CJI refused to elaborate, sources said that Justice R Reghupathy had also clarified the issue to the Madras High Court Chief Justice Hemant Laxman Gokhale. Reghupathy’s letter also carries details of the entire incident, including his conversation with the lawyer who was appearing on behalf of Dr Krishnamurthy and his son Kiruba Sridhar, accused in the Pondicherry University fake marksheet case.

    On June 29, Reghupathy created a flutter when he said in an open court that a Union Minister had tried to influence him to grant anticipatory bail to the two accused. Reghupathy wanted an unconditional apology from the lawyer. Reghupathy had also said he would write to the Prime Minister on the “pressure exerted” on him.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Mr.By: Christopher | 07-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Every tom, dick and harry knows who is the blacksheep and culprit in this episode. As correctly said by Librawalla, all direction and controlled by Gopalapuram, then we cannot expect any justice, only dogs justice and monkeys share of truth. The greatest irony is the CJI is playing in tune with this great injustice to the people of india. As usual our silent spectator, beloved PM is in mute mode whenever we request and expect any action to be taken? God help India.
    very unfortunateBy: Dr Jayendra Parulekar | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward It is really unfortunate that our CJI is trying to cover up the matter
    hogswash, yet another time!By: Jairam Iyer | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward There is this cell phone, right? And it has a number dialed, right? And it can be traced, right? And the duration of the call measured, right?
    Quality JusticeBy: Called Indian | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The entire episod explains the quality of Judgemnets we get from the Judiciary.Keep up the good work, my Lords.
    No minister called the Madras High Court JudgeBy: librawalla | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The episode is intriguing to say the least.The Honb'e Judge hesitated to name the Union Minister with a good intention.Had he mentioned it there would have been a tsunami in the Political scene.Meanwhile the Interested political party with a clever CM as its head swiftly moved in the matter to save his minister and his party from the fall out and perhaps the UPA Govt. and Judiciary cooperated to give a respectful burial to the nasty episode.This is Bharat where the politicians rules the roost.The advocate who said the minister is on the line knows who the minister was Can not this be investigated and the advocate's testimony taken into cognisance to pin down the minister.Finally the people are fooled by all vested interest.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.