Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

No need to conduct N-tests to show might: Kalam

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Apj abdul kalam
    Kalam said people should believe in the country's strength in economy and security.
    Contending that India is a nuclear-weapon state whether the world recognises it or not, former President APJ Abdul Kalam has said the country needs not go for any more atomic tests to prove this status "again and again".

    Kalam, who has brought out a special edition of his e-magazine 'Billion Beats' on the Indo-US nuclear deal, has said the country should believe in its strength as he sought to allay fears that the agreement would compromise India's sovereignty.

    The deal, apart from paving the way for Uranium imports, will help India develop nuclear technology that the world may need in the future, said the strong proponent of the agreement in an article 'Strength respects Strength'.

    He said people should believe in the country's strength in economy and security and prove to the world that "India is wiser" in playing a responsible nation in achieving energy independence vision before 2030.

    Ads by Google

    "I am still confident that one day the nation will wake up to this call. That day is not too far. It should be remembered that the nation is bigger than any individual, organisation and all political parties," he said.

    Detailing the country's three-stage atomic programme in the magazine, Kalam said, "India is a nuclear-weapon state. The nation should behave like a nuclear-weapon state. We do not have to prove to any country that we are again and again a nuclear-weapon state by doing more nuclear tests, whether they agree or not, whether they recognise or not.

    "If they don't recognise it is not our fault; It is not that we are going to lose anything." Kalam, a scientist who played a major role in the 1998 Pokhran tests, said India has "full capability" to deter any nuclear threat by any nation through all means.

    "Yes, we should believe in our strength. Strength respects strength. That is what is happening in the process of Indo-US nuclear deal agreement," said the former President who has also replied to questions posed by some students.

    Seeking to allay concerns over the Hyde Act, he said the laws and regulations of the United States would not come in the way of the agreement. The Act enables America to have nuclear trade with India and constraints imposed by it are applicable to firms in that country only, he said.

    "Indo-US nuclear deal does not have any binding effect on the socio, economic, and political decision of our nation with USA. We have our own independent foreign policy. The government of a particular time certainly has the option to protect the sovereign interest of the nation," he said.

    "Certainly," Kalam said, "this nuclear agreement protects India's interest in the nuclear power sector. Separation plan for civil and defence nuclear facility clearly gives the independence in maintaining the strategic decision. Nobody can interfere in our foreign policy.

    "We can maintain our strategic autonomy in social, economic and political spheres," he added. Kalam also said the 123 Agreement did not impose constraints on India with regard to signing any contract with firms from other countries.

    "Please note that 123 Agreement is a framework agreement and not an implementing contract. Whenever implementing agreements or contracts are signed between Indian entities and US energy firms, India and US firms have to ensure that they are in accordance with laws and regulations as applicable to them.

    "Obviously whatever is not permitted by US laws, will not be signed by US firms. Once the international civil nuclear trade opens up, India can sign contract with several countries," he said in reply to a question asked by a Mumbai school student.

    Noting that the country has only 0.8 per cent of world's known oil and natural gas resources, Kalam said based on the progress visualised for the nation during the next two decades, the power generation capacity has to increase by to 400,000 MW by the year 2030 from the current 144,565 MW.

    "Energy independence has to be achieved through three different sources -- renewable energy, electrical power from nuclear energy and bio-fuel for the transportation sector. Nuclear power generation has been given a thrust by the use of Uranium-based fuel," the former President said.

    However, to meet the increased needs of nuclear power generation, it is essential to pursue the development of nuclear power using Thorium, reserves of which are higher in the country, technology development has to be accelerated for Thorium-based reactors, Kalam added.

    Kalam--India's VisionBy: Abhijeet Roy | 25-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward One of the few true Icons of India has spoken again and has spoken true. The real challenge for India is not what USA thinks about India, but its Energy, Sustained Growth and Ability to be self sufficient in terms of Infrastructure, technology.Wish we could have Kalam back as the President.
    reply mailBy: santoshkumar | 26-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward not just president but as prime minister with all the powers and priveliges to lead India to glory
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.