Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

No objection certificate

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Barely a few days ago, Law Minister Veerappa Moily made noises about the repeal of IPC Section 377. That was followed by a colourful gay parade in some cities. And now the Delhi High Court has spoken. There is already great commotion in the media and certainly an outburst of sentiment in the gay community.

    Earlier, Moily’s announcement had met with much resistance from both within the ruling UPA as well as the opposition BJP. Moily has himself since backtracked on his earlier statement saying that he was misinterpreted. Curiously, Moily in his statement had specifically referred to consultations with and approval of the “Christian Churches” before a final decision.

    Not surprisingly, even before he set out with his task of consulting the churches, reactions had already begun to pour in. The first one to oppose the repeal came from the all-important Islamic seminary, the Darul Uloom of Deoband, followed by other Muslim organisations such as the All India Muslim Personal Law Board. They plan to get other religious bodies on board to oppose the same. Certain Christian groups have also joined the chorus — though not as vociferously.

    Ads by Google

    It is not yet clear whether the difference of opinion that has cropped up within the Congress on the issue is the result of religious minorities raising objections or because they genuinely believe that such a move will be offensive to the “general public”, which in India usually means the Hindus. While Moily might have had his own reasons to refer to the churches’ views, he would have done well to have included a wider section of society rather than singling out one particular religious community which is often wrongly presumed as a killjoy by the gay community.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    @ blackadderBy: varun shukla | 11-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Could you be more clear on your argument. Do not make this forum a place for communal conflict with minority religions. Learn to respect other faiths. This is the secular India where we live in.....not the one of of the belligerent extremists who lost elections miserably. If you have a grievance with one religion then go and post these thoughts in some other forum...Could you be more clear on what bewildered idea you wanted to give on "what about the founder of your own religion??" because that does not make clear sense.
    Baseless argumentBy: Shri | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward This is such a biased and baseless argument. So is father saying impotent men and women shouldn't enjoy any rights such as marriage , adoption etc.. because they cannot procreate?. It is time we accepted that homosexuals exists in India too and they have to be respected for what they are, not what we want them to be. Everybody should enjoy equal rights irrespective of gender, race, religion, caste or sexual orientation.
    BaloneyBy: Blackadder | 03-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward "The Creator has ordained it so that a child is the fruit of union between a man and a woman" - really Father? Then, what about the founder of your own religion?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.