Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

No room for reticence

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Jagdeep Dhankha

    Inexplicably, the Congress regime sat on the Centre’s letter for around three years. In November 2002, a lower divisional clerk of the Rajasthan government reached Shastri Bhawan in New Delhi looking for the state government’s list that was referred by the above-said GOI letter. In a note sent to the CM’s office in July 2003, the state social welfare ministry claimed that the state government had not made any recommendation about including Gujjars in the ST list — that was around four years after the Centre had sought supplementary information in this regard. The file was then buried by the Congress regime.

    In the national interest, the UPA government should at least examine the Chopra committee report. It has unequivocally held that ‘judging eligibility of a group for tribal status, using the (existing) five criteria is, thus, almost an impossibility ‘. This observation of the Chopra Committee is a reiteration of what is spelt out in the Government of India Tribal Policy Document of July 2006 where it was given out that ‘the criteria laid down by the Lokur Committee are hardly relevant today ‘ and ‘more accurate criteria need to be fixed’.

    Ads by Google

    The Chopra Committee has suggested that the Central government initiate a national debate and called on it ‘to abrogate the criteria used so far to include any class of people in the fold of Scheduled Tribe, as these have become obsolete and outdated’. It has recommended that ‘these should be replaced by quantifiable criteria that are relevant in the present context’. According to the Committee, ‘the criteria should be such that they could stand judicial scrutiny ‘ and render examination of ‘the issue with exactitude and reliability’.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.