Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Nobel Prize panel regrets not honouring Mahatma

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As the country marks the 138th birth anniversary of the Father of the Nation, the Nobel Foundation has regretted not giving the peace prize to Mahatma Gandhi. He was nominated five times for the Nobel but the Norwegian Nobel committee believed that he could not be given the honour as he was “neither a real politician nor a humanitarian relief worker”.

    However, the Executive Director of the Nobel Foundation in Sweden Michael Sohlam says the decision not to extend him the prize was a mistake. “We missed a great laureate and that’s Gandhi. It is a big regret,” he told CNN-IBN. “I usually don’t comment on what the Nobel Committees or prize awarding institutions decide. But here, they themselves think he is the one missing,” he said.

    Gandhi was nominated in 1937, 1938, 1939, 1947 and finally a few days before he was shot dead in January 1948. In 1948, the Nobel Committee declined to award a prize on that ground that “there was no suitable living candidate that year”. Nobel Museum curator Dr Anders Barany said “Gandhi is the one we miss the most at the museum. I think that’s a big empty space where we should have had Gandhi.”

    Ads by Google

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.