Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
Search
You are here: IE »   Story

Nomination filing: SC breather for Jayalalithaa

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • The Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered status quo in a case registered against AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa on the directions of the Madras High Court for allegedly filing nominations from four constituencies in violation of the provisions of the Representation of People’s Act. A candidate is entitled to file nominations from a maximum of two constituencies.

    Challenging the High Court order, she filed an appeal before the apex court. Perusing the arguments, the Bench of Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justice R V Raveendran also issued notices to the respondents, including the Election Commission of India.

    The High Court on June 13, 2007, directed the EC to initiate action against Jayalalithaa. Aggrieved by it, the former Chief Minister challenged the registration of a case by the EC.

    In the 2001 state Assembly elections, Jayalalithaa had filed her nomination papers from four constituencies.

    According to DMK MP Kupuswamy, who approached the High Court and later the EC, when the AIADMK chief filed nominations to two additional constituencies on April 24, she was aware that she had already filed two previous ones. It maintained that Jayalalithaa lied on oath.

    However, on Tuesday, challenging the said order, the appellant informed that there was no question of false declaration and Section 177 IPC was not attracted at all. Further, the counsel informed that the nominations filed by her in all the constituencies were rejected by the authorities and she did not contest the said elections at all.

    Express Specials
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.