You are here: IE »   Story

Non-violence cannot tackle terrorism: Dalai Lama

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    The Dalai Lama, a lifelong champion of non-violence candidly stated that terrorism cannot be tackled by applying the principle of ahimsa because the minds of terrorists are closed.

    "It is difficult to deal with terrorism through non-violence," the Tibetan spiritual leader said delivering the Madhavrao Scindia Memorial Lecture here.

    He termed terrorism as the worst kind of violence which is not carried by a few mad people but by those who are very brilliant and educated.

    "They (terrorists) are very brilliant and educated...but a strong ill feeling is bred in them. Their minds are closed," the Dalai Lama said.

    He said the only way to tackle terrorism is through prevention.

    The head of the Tibetan government-in-exile left the audience stunned when he said "I love President George W Bush." He went on to add how he and the US President instantly struck a chord in their first meeting unlike politicians who take a while to develop close ties.

    Ads by Google

    "I told him 'I love you but some of your policies I oppose'," said the spiritual leader to a loud round of applause from the audience which included Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi, Election Commissioner Navin Chawla and several ministers, diplomats and artistes.

    The Dalai Lama said in the aftermath of 9/11 attacks he had asked Bush to spend billions of dollars on education and promotion of non-violence instead of warfare.

    hyBy: httghy | 20-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward ha ha ..ha ha ...
    non-violence n gandhiBy: Harish K Thakur | 26-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward No doubt non-violence is a powerful weapon for upstaging regimes but only those with the content of marality and values. Even Gandhi Ji would talk of do and die and herein lie the clear message of Gandhi Ji to resort to violence in self-defenceand performance of duty in one's station of life. Ill represenatation of Gandhian views has led to mere confusion. Had he been alive he would have transformed his views accordingly.
    non-violence n violenceBy: HARISH THAKUR | 26-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward No doubt non-violence is a powerful weapon for upstaging regimes but only those with the content of marality and values. Even Gandhi Ji would talk of do and die and herein lie the clear message of Gandhi Ji to resort to violence in self-defenceand performance of duty in one's station of life. Ill represenatation of Gandhian views has led to mere confusion and Dalai's statement only carries this message of Gandhi Ji. Marx n Gandhi talked of stateless society since state was symbolic of terror n exploitation for them but what if state has become more straonger. The duo was not a stangnant stale pool rather dynamic in thought and the two would definitely have come out with neo thinking required by the times. How can we dub Gandhi as mere non-violent creature when we know that Gita was the inspiring source of his conception.He too would have transformed his methodology and its his aacievement that heproved the idea of non-violence as a powerful mean too. Dalai is right and so was Gandhi.
    What do we practice?By: James Capellini | 25-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward There clearly are very few practitioners out there these days. Only a clouded mind could interpret the Dalai Lama's suggestion that "It is difficult to deal with terrorism through non-violence" as meaning, "Violence is the only way to deal with terrorism." Prevention does not equal preemptive strike. Success in our personal practice, in our efforts to cultivate virtue, is not something to be compromised so quickly. Do we turn to violence in our homes when a family member is acting out? How "foreign" does someone need to be before we consider their life worthless? I live in the United States, a country built upon the graves of millions of slaves and Native Americans. Our presidents of the early 1800s were elected to office precisely because they promised to rid the country of the "Indian Savages." And they did. I believe we may need to reexamine how we determine which violence is "justified" and which is not. History is written by the victors. But a practitioner reads between the lines.
    The efficacy of nonviolenceBy: Rev. Robert Mills | 19-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward So long as 'State sanctioned' terrorism and Human rights are ignored by world leaders, along with policies of war by these very same State powers, what the Delai Lama remarks will hold true. However, advovcates of non-violence must continue to promote revolutionary nonviolence which seeks to transform hearts and minds as well as the 'State'.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.