Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Northern Errors

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • A significant development has taken place with regard to the status of Gilgit-Baltistan — a part of the erstwhile undivided state of Jammu and Kashmir under Pakistani control since 1947. Bordering Afghanistan, China and India, the area was perceived as strategically important for Pakistan and therefore was isolated from the rest of ‘Azad Jammu and Kashmir’. Treated as a separate administrative unit comprised of Gilgit, Baltistan, Hunza and Nagar, it was designated as the ‘Northern Areas’ and was denied any kind of legal or political status. While Pakistan-administered-Kashmir (though controlled by the federal ministry of Kashmir affairs) had some semblance of political governance, this area merely had administrative status. Under the direct control of Islamabad, it was governed by civil administrators. And because of the ambiguity about its legal status, the people belonging to this area were not represented in the Pakistan National Assembly. The right of democratic representation, therefore, was not extended to them in any form. Worse, they were also denied access to justice. The Judicial Commissioner had supreme power and people had no right to appeal. The Supreme Court of Pakistan had no jurisdiction; nor did the judiciary of Pakistan-administered-Kashmir have any role for the people in this part.  

    Due to this, the area has suffered unrest for quite some time. Local grievances forcefully articulated during the last few decades, have not only been in the context of lack of a modern democratic system but also the suppression of the political identity of the area and the people. By denying it its traditional name, Gilgit-Baltistan, its status was reduced merely to that of a geographical entity. Further, there were allegations of substantial demographic and territorial interventions by the Pakistani state. Apart from the transfer of around 5000 sq km of the area to China, which is aggressively pursuing its interests in the area, the Pakistani government has been accused of pushing demographic change in this Shia-dominated area. It is alleged that Pakistani rulers by allotting the land to outsiders, especially Punjabis, Pathans and other Sunnis, encouraged them to settle in this area. There is a general feeling that this demographic engineering has altered the area’s traditional culture of harmonious co-existence. There have been several incidences of sectarian violence in the last few years.  

    ... contd.

    Next123
    View from Azad KashmirBy: Asif Masood Raja | 09-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Readers,As my humble contribution I shall add that the current boundaries of nations are mostly developed in 19th and 20th centuries where we see that Jammu, Kashmir, Ladakh, Gilgit, Baltistan as part of greater state of Jammu and Kashmir. This map is approved by United Nations and you can see map of state of Jammu
    Gilgit Baltistan, A view from Azad KashmirBy: Asif Masood Raja | 09-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Readers,As my humble contribution I shall add that the current boundaries of nations are mostly developed in 19th and 20th centuries where we see that Jammu, Kashmir, Ladakh, Gilgit, Baltistan as part of greater state of Jammu and Kashmir. This map is approved by United Nations and you can see map of state of Jammu
    A change in nomenclature onlyBy: thetrajectory | 08-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Pakistan’s move is doubly problematic: apart from under-addressing the anxiety of the people of the Northern Areas, the Empowerment Ordinance has further complicated the politico-legal dimensions of the J
    Point of view from Gilgit Baltistan (part 2)By: Saleem Ullah khan | 08-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward cont from previous : so, again they lost the war, and the that whole area of gilgit baltistan was freed from these SO CALLED RULES by war, while rest of Subcontinent was freed by a single order of PEN, so i would urge you to undertake this point as well, and for me THE THEN KASHMIRI MAHARAJA was nothing more than a rebel who decided to join INDIA (taking orders from THEN RULERS for personal gains) against the law of partition, so as to create a point of conflict between newly established India and Pakistan, and they (Britishers) finally are successful to the extent that they have almost destroyed the complete region by just a mere single conflict created by them, which could have been avoided and could have saved thousands of lives of both India and Pakistan who fought several wars and now are Nuclear States and yet on the verge of another possible and HUGE destruction, I just want to pray that MAY THE LEADERS OF BOTH INDIA AND PAKISTAN GET THE WISDOM TO SERVE THE PEOPLE THAN RULE.
    Point of view from Gilgit BaltistanBy: Saleem Ullah khan | 08-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Nice work Rekha, a deep insight into the proceedings, but being part of this particular region, i have a serious point on " a position established by the high court of ‘Azad Kashmir’ in a famous verdict given by Chief Justice Majid Malik. " for me .. ANY DAMN PERSON FROM ANY DAMN AREA IF ADJUDGED FOR SOME PERSONAL GAINS then letme tell you that there is NO ANY BIGGER COURT OF LAW other than PUBLIC, so for me the DECISION of that judge is a mere crap piece of paper (i apologize for these words) becoz if tomorrow British Court of LAW says that Gilgit Baltistan is actually its jurisdiction, since they had ruled the area, so for me this is another CRAP, so i will evaluate your concerns as partial, as you need to actually study the history of this area, which is freed by the people of this area from BRITISHERS by a WAR which was fought again by The SAME ARMY with HELP OF THEN KASHMIRI MAHARAJAs when subcontinent was against BRITISH RULE and KASHMIRI MAHARAJA was HELPING BRITISH gain control
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.