You are here: IE »   Story

Now, consensus

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    Chief Election Commissioner N. Gopalaswami’s recommendation against Election Commissioner Navin Chawla is predictably setting off alarms that a constitutional crisis may be at hand. Gopalaswami’s letter to the president suggesting that his colleague be removed from the Election Commission on grounds that he is “partisan” has drawn the EC into two debates. One is the legal debate. Recommendation of action against an election commissioner is uncharted terrain constitutionally. Legal experts are divided on the validity of Gopalaswami’s action and on what the constitutionally valid next steps could be. A multi-member EC, as developments since T.N. Seshan’s stormy tenure as CEC in the ’90s show, is still a work in progress. And the debate ensuing from the current development could bring clarity to the commission’s composition and functioning in more ways than may be immediately obvious.

    However, for this to be constructively conducted, it is important that participants in the second debate, the political one, be alert to the national interest. Given that Gopalaswami’s recommendation comes upon a BJP complaint about Chawla’s proximity to the Congress, there is great danger that the two political parties could entrench themselves in extremely partisan corners. This would militate against their own interests. This is not the first time that members of a commission have been targeted by political parties. Seshan was caught in a very public and very aggressive standoff with the Narasimha Rao government. In his term as CEC, J.M. Lyngdoh was targeted by Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi. And even the current commission had its brush with allegations of possible bias on the timing of the Karnataka assembly elections. But here is the bottomline. Each time there was not a doubt that the polls conducted were free and fair; never was the legitimacy of the new House in any way compromised. So, even as the debate rages on the composition of the commission, as it inevitably will, it needs to be acknowledged that it is the EC’s procedures and record that check against bias in the conduct of elections. No political party can possibly afford to let the crisis get so out of hand that, two months before a general election, its legitimacy is questioned.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    ELECTION COMMISSIONBy: N.V.SANKARAN | 03-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Until recently, the common man believed that the institutions like Judiciary, CBI, the Military and the Election Commission discharge their duties in an unbiased and non-partisan manner. But, the conflicting observations of two High Court Judges in Kerala regarding the CBI inquiry into the Abhaya case has cast some doubts about the impartiality of not only the CBI, but also of the Judiciary. The various reports of "Safron infiltration of the military" after the arrest of a serving officer in connection with the Malegaon blasts has made ordinary people to genuinely doubt whether the Military is indeed impartial. The only remaining institution was the EC. In view of the allegations against Mr. Chawla, the government would be well advised to transfer him to some other position where impartiality does not matter much and appoint another person who can be trusted to be completely unbiased, say a retired SC judge, to maintain the credibility of the EC, irrespective of whether Mr. Chawla is impartial or not.
    medical facilities for poorBy: suresh bansal | 03-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Like education cess charged on income tax I feel there should be medical cess also exclusively for the benefit of the poor and needy as the facilities though being provided are inadequate looking into the size of the population.Even in govt. hospitals practically inability is shown by the authorities when some specific medicie is required . Govt. should show a little concern in this regard also.
    mobile usage while drivingBy: suresh bansal | 03-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward The death of innocent children near ferozpur(punjab)has once again raised a serious queston about misuse of cell phone . The culprit is safe and ran from the scene instead of saving and helping the injured. As per news report the kids before the mishap requested that the train is approaching and the driver was busy with the cell phoe. Through this paper I want to tell that such cases be dealt like other criminal cases against the culprit. Thanks.
    It is antidemocratic to put chawlaBy: Dr.G.Srinivasan | 03-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Each time there was not a doubt that the polls conducted were free and fair; never was the legitimacy of the new House in any way compromised.I beg to differ .When the elections are conducted it is for the members of the parliament and state legislative assemblies including the PM.This is the obvious thing.But in such a situation how can India have a PM who has not won a single election that too for a whole term?Are these so called experts not cheating the people?Then why are elections held after all?
    Instutution makes democracyBy: Natarajan | 03-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward The ruling party has the mandate to select Supreme Court Judge, EC, and President, besides other officials. While any candidate selected by the ruling party will be one their own men (or women), they should also make sure that they do not appoint someone blatantly partisan. If they do, the next party that comes to power, will do exactly the same and before you know it, the institutions will be at each other's throat. For a functioning system, it is imoprtant to have a independent institutions (or else what you get is Pakistan). Congress has historically looked down upon independent institutions. Look at the way Pratibha Patil was appointed. She has taken all charm out of the position in sharp contrast to APJ Kalam. The independence that Seshan built could similarly be undermined by Congress this time
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.