Premium
This is an archive article published on November 29, 2010

Now Kasab claims he was not part of 26/11 core conspiracy

The arguments were made by Kasab's lawyer before justices Ranjana Desai and R V More.

Listen to this article
Now Kasab claims he was not part of 26/11 core conspiracy
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

Pakistani gunman Ajmal Kasab claimed he was not part of the 26/11 attacks conspiracy hatched in Pakistan by LeT and argued his confession recorded by a magistrate and plea of guilt made before the trial court should be discarded as they were contrary to each other.

The arguments were made by Kasab’s lawyer Amin Solkar before justices Ranjana Desai and R V More of the Bombay High Court who are hearing confirmation of death sentence awarded to him by the trial court for his role in the 26/11 terror attacks.

The defence lawyer argued that there was no material to suggest that Kasab was part of the conspiracy relating to attacks on Hotel Taj Mahal,Hotel Oberoi-Trident and Nariman House. His role was confined only to attacks at Chhatrapati Shivaji Railway Terminus and in and around Cama Hospital.

Story continues below this ad

“At the most,it can be said that Kasab had performed the role of a contract killer and could be held responsible for the death of persons at CST and in surrounding areas,” Solkar argued.

The basic thrust of arguments by the defence lawyer was to minimise the role of Kasab in the conspiracy and aim at commuting his death sentence to life imprisonment.

Kasab had no role to play in the attacks on hotels Taj Mahal,Oberoi and Nariman House and there is no evidence to this effect,Solkar submitted.

Kasab did not appear today on the screen put up in the court for the video conference link to enable him to hear arguments from jail.

Story continues below this ad

Solkar said when an accused makes a confession it could result in conviction. Similarly,when a guilt plea is made before the court it should be considered like confession.

In this case,Kasab has made a confession as well as guilt plea. Both these confessions were contradictory to each other and should not be accepted because they create doubts as to which one should be believed,he argued.

Pointing out the contradictions in confession and guilt plea of Kasab,Solkar said Kasab had admitted before a magistrate that he had killed Amarsing Solanki,navigator of fishing trawler Kuber through which terrorists arrived in Mumbai by sea route. He also admitted to have killed police officer Tukaram Ombale in an encounter at Chowpatty.

However,in the guilt plea,Kasab denied having killed Solanki and Ombale. He had told the trial court that he was not aware who killed Solanki and that he had seen slain terrorist Shoaib coming out of boat’s cabin with a knife smeared with blood and throwing it in the sea.

Story continues below this ad

In the guilt plea,Kasab had also said that outside Cama Hospital he and Abu Ismail were under attack from police officers in a jeep and that before he could retaliate the policemen fired at him because of which he sustained injury in hand. He also blamed Ismael for killing officers Hemant Karkare,Vijay Salaskar and Ashok Kamte.

In the guilt plea,Kasab said that at Girgaum Chowpatty,constable Tukaram Ombale had caught hold of his collar and pulled him out of the car in which he was seated with Ismael. Kasab further said he was surrounded by policemen who assaulted him and he fell unconscious. When he gained consciousness he was in hospital.

However,in confession before a magistrate Kasab had admitted to have killed Ombale.

Denying role of Kasab in the conspiracy,his lawyer said at the most it can be said Kasab had executed the conspiracy and that he could be charged for murders like any other contract killer.

Story continues below this ad

To substantiate his argument,Kasab’s lawyer Amin Solkar referred to Supreme Court Judgement in Rajiv Gandhi assassination case in which Nalini Singh was an accused. Solkar said in Nalini Singh’s case,the Supreme court had laid down four categories of conspiracy — core planning,aiding and abetting,being part of conspiracy and executing it and lastly executing the conspiracy. Kasab fell in the fourth category,he argued.

To establish a conspiracy there has to be meeting of minds and there is nothing to suggest this aspect in Kasab’s confession,he argued. The only material relied upon by the prosecution was Kasab’s confession before a magistrate which he retracted later and also contradicted it in his guilt plea.

The court is currently hearing confirmation of death penalty given to Kasab for his role in dastardly attacks.

Kasab’s appeal against his conviction is yet to come up for hearing while government would argue later on its appeal against acquittal of co-conspirators Faheem Ansari and Sabauddin Ahmed.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement