Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Nuclear-armed India, Pak can't take over each other: Zardari

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Asif Ali Zardari
    Zardari says nuclear armed India and Pakistan cannot take over each other.

    On the US role in Afghanistan, he said "what the US does in Afghanistan is its own business. It is a sovereign state." Referring to Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Zardari said "Karzai and myself are friends." When pointed out that he was known as 'Mr 10 per cent' for alleged involvement in corruption, he said it was a cliché "created by the opposition and they tried me for 11 and a half years (the time he served in jail without being sentenced). I think a man should be judged by the fact he has walked the fire and come out without a spot."

    He also renewed a call for the US to sell aerial drones to the Pakistan military in place of mounting cross-border attacks. "My position is that I have always asked for possession of the drone; I want the Pakistani flag on it." On assassination of his wife and former Premier Benazir Bhutto, Zardari said that after the incident "the people in the street were calling for blood and we went for a democratic offensive." "I wish (former President Perrvez) Musharraf had looked after my wife" by providing her adequate security, he said.

    Previous12
    Nuclear armed India,Pakistan cannot takeover the other-ZardariBy: Premangsu Chowdry | 07-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward One is intrigued by the remarks from Zardari that India is not "the foremost threat"( maybe the secondary) to Pakistan; it seems timed,curiously with the US Joint Chief of Defence Staff supporting the plans of the Pakistan Army Chief, the de facto ruler of his country. These may imply that the recent Military Aid from the US can be used by their Army not only against the Talibans, but also for strengthening itself against India. Zardari's words of India not being the chief threat were meant for a 'naive' India, and aimed to allay India's apprehension of some of the huge US Aid being diverted; Pakistan emphasised the Taliban threat across the border to India; it has always tried to convince the West that India poses a threat to it. However, if the mutual nuclear threat and the Taliban bogey to India are aimed, as an indirect approach to India, for her active assistance against the Taliban, it will delight the West.India will continue to be amused at the games Pakistan plays.
    Why should India occupy Pakistan?By: Kalpathy Venkataraman | 07-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward It is really funny on the part of Pakistan to think that India is out to capture and rule Pakistan. Why should India bother about occupying a country with huge liabilities? China is always interested in annexing Taiwan for the simple reason that it is economically sound and has huge assets. The same can't be said about Pakistan. Perhaps the Pakistanis may welcome Indian occupation in the hope of better life. For India, it will be a huge task to feed millions of illiterate people whose only occupation is to produce more children. It is like feeding an unproductive elephant.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.