Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Obama calls for Indo-Pak talks, PM links it to terror

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Manmohan obama
    PM Manmohan Singh shakes hands with US President Barack Obama during a meeting at G-20 Summit in London.

    US President Barack Obama called for a dialogue process between India and Pakistan but Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said that a “minimum pre-condition” was that Islamabad should not allow its soil to be used to promote terrorism.

    Asked after their first substantive meeting, that lasted an hour, whether India was willing to talk with Pakistan on Kashmir, the Prime Minister said: “We are willing to discuss bilaterally all the issues that bedevil the two countries. This cannot proceed if hundreds of people die like they did in the Mumbai attack.”

    Describing their first meeting as one “marked by exceptional warmth and cordiality”, Singh said, “We have a global strategic partnership with the US. We both are agreed to further strengthen our relationship and make it more productive in diverse fields.”

    Singh said they discussed international efforts required to deal with terrorism emanating from India’s neighbourhood, adding: “We had a significant convergence of views and approaches in this regard.”

    Ads by Google

    Later at a packed press conference, Obama, describing the Prime Minister as a “wise and decent man” said, “We are extra concerned about terrorism and not simply terrorism emanating from Pakistan.”

    Obama said he and Singh discussed how the two could coordinate more broadly to counter terrorism. Advocating greater dialogue between India and Pakistan, Obama said, “In the nuclear age, when the greatest enemy of India and Pakistan should be poverty, it makes more sense to create dialogue between the two.”

    At a separate press conference, Singh, whom UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown requested to speak at the banquet dinner on Wednesday night immediately after Obama’s address to the Group of 20 leaders, said that he had thanked Obama for what he had done to make possible the transformation of India-US relations, and to bring to fruition the Indo-US nuclear deal.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Blabber-mouth ObamaBy: Hero Vaz | 03-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Obama should first solve his problems at home, in Iraq and in Afghanistan and prove his worth before opening his mouth on other issues including Indo-Pak relations. Obama's suggestion should be summarily rejected and India should chart its own course of action, in its own interest, ignoring what blabber-mouths say.
    Too much democracy in IndiaBy: RK | 03-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward India's elections are just 2 weeks away. We will be replacing one set of 'goonda's with another set. India needs 2 changes. No more coalition governments. Like France, there must a follow-up election between the top 2 vote-getting parties, to select the winner. Plus, a young leader like Obama, who is committed to the progress of India.
    ElectionBy: K.Balakumaran | 03-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Mr singh believes in complaining to Barack Obama like a student complaining to Head Teacher .he is too old and weak to lead the country.he could not raise his voice because Soniaji tells him to hide behind her sarees.He proved that he is a puppet ruler who cannot make any decisions on his own without Soniaji's approval.That is why it took so long to crush the Terrorists in Mumbai.If that is a different ruler from BJP then they would be teaching a lesson to Pakistan once they knew pakistani Army was involved.In this election the weak ruler who is being nice to Americans should be rejected.If someone is nice to U.S.A menas India has been sold to U.S interests.Indians will face the consequences in the future for that. Congress party and its Young Rahul Gandhi who cannot find an Indian partner like his Dad cannot make this country stronger only the BJP who made it prosperous will do that and Build Ram Temple which is the dream of all Hindus.
    mumbai blastBy: puneeth | 03-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward why central is know noy talking abouit mumbai blastr.First they asked the culprits to be hganded over to India and then they gave back why?
    Why 2 sides contradict?By: irfaan khan | 03-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward nothing extra-ordinary in this, nothing exceptional. Just american thinking about there gains in region . And on this hand, india thinking for there own gains. Simple it is :-)
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.