You are here: IE »   Story

Obama should not lose sight on India: Burns

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Nicholas burns
    Nicholas Burns is the lead negotiator on the Indo-US nuclear deal.
    Discount UK Shopping

    Barack Obama should use Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's visit to US to push for stronger military and strategic ties between the two countries and the President is uniquely positioned to help India and Pakistan avoid the "nightmare fear of war", says a former US diplomat.

    Nicholas Burns, the lead negotiator on the Indo-US nuclear deal, said Obama faces a classic diplomatic challenge in South Asia - how to balance a short-term need for progress in Afghanistan and Pakistan without losing sight of "our equally important long-term ambitions with India."

    "To be fair, India is a difficult and irresolute partner on some of the issues, particularly climate. But, Obama can act more vigorously to restore the energy on India left to him by his predecessors," Burns wrote in 'Boston Globe', published today hours before the Singh-Obama meet.

    US should work "more actively" behind the scenes to urge India and Pakistan to restore their Composite Dialogue, reduce bilateral tensions, and commit to progress on the Kashmir issue, he wrote.

    Ads by Google

    "As the United States is now the key power broker in the region, Obama is uniquely positioned to help nuclear-armed India and Pakistan avoid the nightmare fear of war that has bedevilled their relations since Partition in 1947," he said.

    Burns said Obama should push for stronger military and strategic ties between the two countries.

    "India is a natural military partner of the United States given our common interest in resisting terrorism in South Asia and beyond," he wrote in the aticle 'Ways Obama can tend bonds with India'.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Blame is America'sBy: Hero Vaz | 25-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward America has Pakistan under its thumb but refuses to turn the screws on Paki terrorism, illegal nuclear proliferation and Paki back stabbing. Fighting a war in Af-Pak with one hand tied behind does not do the Americans any credit. Unchecked misuse of American aid by Pak, of which the Americans were not ignorant, is another blunder of the US. If the situation is bad in South Asia, most of the blame attaches to US presence, policy and style of functioning in the area.
    HopeBy: Harish - Australia | 25-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Obama has already lost sight
    Burns comments By: Indians | 25-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward .... What is Burns "Long Term Ambitions" WITH India means. First what does the word "WITH" means? does it mean "along with" OR "about" (as it may be meant in U.S.English) India. That is U.S. Long-term ambitions ABOUT INDIA? THIS IS A BIG QUESTION.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.