Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

On a GM platter

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • experience with Bt cotton shows that cropping patterns do not adhere to such abstractions. In fact, in 2001, some cotton farmers served notice of their impatience with the regulatory delays by reaping the benefits of Bt technology, whether inadvertently or through deliberate piracy. The subsequent commercial clearance of Bt cotton has also been a learning curve, and has compelled the development of more productive hybrid varieties.

    The case for hastening Bt trials without compromising safety checks is not driven by a desire to catch up with agricultural economies like those in the US, China or Argentina (where the acreage under GM cultivation has grown rapidly). It is instead to give the farmer more options.

    Previous12
    Losing of Natural foodBy: VG Ranganath | 22-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward In future people may lose natural food and they may depend coercly by initiatives of government on GM food. According to available reports in India, they is no appropriate machinery working on it. According to Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, panel on Genetically modified foods have been constituted. We have to wait and see how far they enforces and implements the provisions of Genetically modified foods. In india the required thing is proper storage for food but not production. Due to all these using and inviting the GM Food Trails we may face the environmental problems. In India even though we are having legislations to keep vigilance on all these but it is gloomy state and blind watch.
    Foolish research on processing...By: Madhumita Chakraborti | 10-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Enhancing processing facilities and thereby the duration for storage would only cause a steep rise of hoarding activities by middlemen. Even modern technological institutions working on such issues are never bothered about such implications that can have a detrimental effect on ordinary people. Is technology there only to protect the selfish and greedy motives of middlemen ?
    Its food, Do the right thing, not the quick thing.By: Aman | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Guys, step back and think about it. What kind of food will you want buy for your kids? Something natural and pristine or some X-Crop mutated by men in laboratories. Agreed taht we need to raise our food production, but are we going to serve poison on their platters? There are other alternative methods to increase food production - like diversity on farms, use of bio-fertilizers etc. Yes they are more elaborate and slow but they are the right thing. Its our food people, food that we eat. We better be right about it. And remeber, GM is a non reversible technoology. Once its in our ecosystem, its to stay and cross pollinate other species. Theres no going back. We should give it more thought as europe did.
    Only the state of variables would change.By: CK Raju, Thrissur | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward To me, the sequence goes like this. Yesterday, it had been on cash crops, today it is on food crops, tomorrow its going to be on animal life, and the day after it will be on human life itself. Everywhere the so called informed arguments will remain the same. Only the state of variables will be altered. The final victor would undoubtedly be the one who is calling all the shots now. Let us bow out.
    GM crops are the way of the futureBy: Eddy | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I am a senior researcher on crop plant genetic resources at the University of California. I would like your readers to consider this: 1) Yields have reached their plateau with conventional plant breeding techniques; the only way to go forward is to use genetic engineering (biotechnology) or exploit other underutilized crops or domesticate new crops for food. 2) Altered genes from plants CANNOT enter the human body in anyway; hence GM crops cause cancer is a FALSE statement. 3) True, demand for organically grown produce is rising in the USA, BUT it is always much more expensive than non-organically grown fruits and vegetables and hence the demand is extremely small. Especially in these times of recession people buy those produce with the least price. e.g., if I see a head of organic lettuce for $2 versus another for $1.25 and both look alike then I will buy the $1.25 one. 4) True, some original taste is lost in GM crops, but that has to be weighed against people going hungry.
    Lets start an INFORMED debate on GMO-2By: Jay | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward There are some valid questions regarding GMO. Eg, many recent reports show that yield of transgenic crop is less (about 10%) under “normal” conditions. But useless rhetoric is suppressing valid questions against GMOs. Transgenic crops are safer in many ways as they are extensively tested before release. Most Indian vegetables and fruits contain high pesticides/herbicide residues; majority of our water sources including ground water is contaminated by toxic industrial waste and agricultural run off (pesticide and other chemicals used in cultivation). Those are more dangerous as compared to GMO, so far public health and environment is concerned. Lastly, if we had a limited world population and reasonably decent distribution of wealth, we would have avoided GMO. It’ll be foolish to boycott it for hypothetical dangers and embrace guaranteed starvation and/or huge hike of global food prices (and other commodities as well). India can not afford that luxury with its 1.2 billion people to feed
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.