You are here: IE »   Story

On oustee’s appeal, Information panel raps Damodar Valley Corp

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC), the country's first muti-purpose river valley project, is under fire from the topmost Right to Information (RTI) panel for its “disheartening” treatment of land oustees who have "sacrificed" their land for power infrastrusture.

    The scathing observations against the DVC came in the light of its alleged denial of rehabilitation to a physically-disabled person whose 20-acre land was acquired on the promise of a Rs 3 lakh compensation and alternative employment.

    Mohammed Rafique Ansari of Pakdih village in Jamtara district of Jharkhand appealed to the Central Information Commission (CIC) against “discrimination” shown by the corporation in not giving him the “promised” job as he was unable to pay a bribe to DVC officials.

    Information Commissioner M M Ansari observed that Rafique’s case indicated that the DVC had “so far failed in the promotion of corporate social responsibility”.

    Ads by Google

    The DVC which came into being on July 7, 1948 on the strength of a Constituent Assembly Act had its initial focus on flood control, irrigation, generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, eco-conservation and afforestation, as well as job creation for the socio-economic well-being of people residing in and around areas affected by its projects. However, over the past few decades, power generation had gained priority.

    The Bench criticised the corporation for concentrating solely on development of infrastrusture, mainly power, without no regard for the welfare of land oustees, who are “marginalised or pushed to worse-off economic conditions”.

    “While the DVC may have made significant contribution to the process of development of infrastructure, mainly power, it has also contributed to the marginalisation of displaced persons/land oustees, who have sacrificed their land for DVC's project,” the Bench said in a recent judgment.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.