Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

On the ATS

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan
    * The editorial, ‘Take no prisoners’ rightly assessed that “Advani has sacrificed good sense and national interest to short-term ambition”. The prime ministerial candidate of the opposition has indeed painted “himself into a corner if Thakur and Purohit are, in the end, proved to be guilty and by smearing our law and order mechanisms as politically pliable, he could inflict deep injury on the credibility of these institutions.” Actually, ever since the probe into the Malegaon blasts linked the suspects to Hindu terrorist outfits, the BJP has gone on the offensive because it feels nervous and disoriented, not knowing which way to turn.

    —B.K. Chatterjee, Faridabad

    * Several counter-terrorism experts and commentators have disapproved of the Maharashtra Police’s reprehensible resort to a public trial of the blast suspects through selective leaks to an obliging and unquestioning media. The relentless media campaign against the so-called “Hindu terror network” seemed designed to mark the detained suspects like Sadhvi Pragya and Lt-Col Purohit guilty even before a trial.

    Ads by Google

    —M. Ratan, New Delhi

    Heed the law

    * This refers to your editorial ‘The offence of defence’. Being the president of a national political party, Rajnath Singh is not supposed to issue a clean chit to those accused of terrorism simply because they belong to a community the BJP professes to be the sole custodian of. Even if the BJP’s political adversaries were to make scapegoats of the accused, the party ought to stay aloof from them.

    —Hemant Kumar, Ambala

    Unity’s moment

    * This refers to ‘The Malegaon precipice’ by Pratap Bhanu Mehta (IE, November 18). It is really thought-provoking and scary since the threat of the balkanisation of India is now very real. We need to emphasise and implement the “One Nation, One People, One Rule” principle without any further delay. And without asking for any quarters.

    The laws governing us also must be rewritten urgently. Most of the laws of day-to-day governance were drafted by foreigners with the idea of governing a large unwieldy local population with a handful of rulers. The British never used similar procedures in their homeland. We have been independent for too long to not have devised laws and procedures for self-governance.

    —Anil K. Singh, New Delhi

    In our genes

    * This refers to Nalin Mehta’s article ‘Barack Singh Dhoni’. He compares the electoral system in India with that of the US and has a view that the US has a better system since it elected Barack Obama. But it is meaningless to try and emulate what others are doing, which from a distance looks good. Every country evolves its own system. The same system need not be workable in another country. In India, heredity is an established and sustaining system. There is no point in denigrating that and clamouring for disregarding it in our life.

    —K. Raghu, Ahmedabad

    Paradoxical SecularismBy: Nilesh Kamath | 22-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward It’s a irony that when parties like RJD and SP declare that SIMI is not involved in terrorism it’s secular, but when the Sangh Parivar says the same about the Malegaon blasts accused its Communal.When Mr.Amar Singh provides financial support of Rs.10 Lakhs to the suspects of Delhi Blast it is secular but when the Sangh Parivar provides moral support for the Malegaon accused it is communal. When the Batla House encounter is questioned it is secular but when questions are raised about the role of ATS in the Malegaon blasts investigations it is communal.In truth the word secularism is loosing its relevance in Indian politics today as a section of politicians, media and the intellectuals and also public use the word selectively to suit their own ends.Warm RegardsNilesh Kamath . MKalakunj RoadKodialbailMangalore - 575003Karnataka
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.