Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

One-party state?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The World Economic Forum’s India meeting in New Delhi featured some thoughtful panels, speeches and ideas. But it was difficult to avoid the fear that what we were seeing was a disturbing exercise in crony capitalism. The speakers, the panels, the discussions — all conveyed a disturbing impression, that India is a one-party state of some sort. The Opposition was frozen out. (Nor were there prominent voices from the Congress’ UPA allies.) An occasion for business and politics to question each other becomes one where business humbly submits an agenda for action to the dominant party in power. What else is that but banana-republic crony capitalism?

    The Davos meeting of the WEF, in January every year, is a wonderfully eclectic event where a broad diversity of thought is brought to bear on some timely theme. In the past, India summits have shown a similar approach. But many local summits, in partnership with local bodies, too often descend into exercises in statist pageantry. This is the direction in which the WEF, and the Confederation of Indian Industry, have made the mistake of taking the India summit this year. The WEF needs to wake up to one basic fact: India is not China or Singapore. India’s is the most diverse polity in the world. So, WEF, if you try thinking about policy while ignoring that, you’re condemning yourself to eventual irrelevance. Talk to just the Union cabinet while ignoring dynamic CMs, and you’ll miss the basics of the India story.

    Ads by Google

    Tragically the lessons of the past have not taken hold. Indian industry — many of whose leaders were cringingly obsequious at the meeting about the absolute wonderfulness of the government and its plans for the future — has allowed itself to be stuck in an old, pre-

    ... contd.

    Next12
    CRONY Vs CRONYBy: Rajesh Kaul | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The concern brought out in the edit is absolutely genuine, notwithstanding the pathetic state of opposition ranks. Those of us who attained adulthood in the seventies well appreciate such trends with a sense of palpable unease. From "Q - let off" to parole of Manu Sharma on one hand and Haryana assembly power play to Madhu Koda's minefields (strange Tehalka didnt get stung by this one or didnt want to?) are all ominously sympotomatic. Foreign policy fiascos such as Sharmal Sheikh or curtailing Dalai Lama's Arunachal visit are enough to create necessary insecurity in the single-party-majority ruling dispensation. Flashback now, read Sonia for Indira and Rahul for Sanjay. And if you thought only the corporate is to blame for crony capitalism, I would disagree. The so called vibrant-for ever-breaking-news media, too needs to take blame. Why tow only the party in power? Why report only "everything wrong with every one" in the opposition day after day? I m sure some one in opposition has atleast done one bit worth reporting, if not lauding. Need is to strengthen the institutions of democracy, crony journalism as much as crony capitalism make banana republics.
    FIRST LOOK AT THE SELFBy: NAVIN ASTI | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Media and especially IE,TOI,THE HINDU(only in name),NDTV,CNN-IBN etc,have no right to comment this way.Right from prior to General Elections of2004,these agencies have contributed very significanly for making the Nation only one(Congress)Party rule,thereby doing greatest disservice(more than Industrialists)to the country's democracy.It is better first they improve and stop rallying behind even Anti-National steps of Congress.otherwise it is like "Prostitute advocating celibacy".
    REAL AND EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE IS THE NEED OF THE HOURBy: R Sundar | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The alternative to Congress is certainly not the BJP. India needs an real and effective alternative and not a bad replacement. It is another matter that BJP is finished for good.
    Who encourages Crony Capitalism ?By: K.C. Sharma | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward IE can advise the business not to foster crony capitalism but will it have the guts to advise the ruling party which should bear the primary responsibility? I daresay that media has played a significant part in bringing us to this pass.I can't remember any time in the last 7/8 years that media has not painted today's main opposition party in most hideous of colors.Business has always been like this.They have always to keep the on the right side of the powers that be.The present ruling party has always been arrogant and its arrogance knows no bounds after the recent electoral wins at centre and in states.Arrogance also breeds corruption both financial and moral.
    Crony CapitalismBy: N G Varadan | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Look, After all media is also business!
    Pot calling the kettle blackBy: gaurav | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward I'm still wondering if I'm really read this editorial in IE! Business organisations will in most cases will bat for the ruling party, after all they've vested interests and the fact earning profits is the top priority of a business. So they can't afford the displeasure of the ruling party. But does that applies to Indian media as well? I think it does, especially to the English media, they're just another business running for profit. I was an avid subscriber of IE till last year (2008) for its views and the will to take on the high and mighty. But since then eulogizing the Congress became the trend even in IE and since early this year, prior to elections, IE is sunk to the same depth in this irresponsible act as the other dailies.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.