Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

One-time offer

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Finance Minister P. Chidambaram has apparently raised hackles in “industry” by asking that they do their bit at this time of crisis by ensuring prices are lower. It would be “wiser”, according to Chidambaram, to make a few sacrifices of value to try and keep your employees loyal, to try and keep inventories moving, to try and keep customers satisfied. “Industry” was apparently deeply dismayed; though the heads of bodies such as the Confederation of

    Indian Industry and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry both made conciliatory statements — the former expressing confidence that many segments would see new prices soon, and the latter insisting that new business models, focussing on high volume and low margins, were needed at this time.

    Normally, any raised hackles would be completely justified.

    We are not supposed to be a state-directed economy any more, and India’s high-growth years this decade have been powered by the entrepreneurial private sector. The finance minister’s personal preferences shouldn’t usually carry any weight: after all, commercial interests are fighting on the front lines and are best able, in normal circumstances, to figure out what price response will best preserve the Indian growth story. But these are not normal circumstances. Banks are worried, consumers are hurting, the first, tenuous political gains of liberalisation are at stake. If there’s anything in industry’s interest, it’s to react quickly and adaptively, and that is what the finance minister was urging them to do.

    Ads by Google

    Remember, this was being held out as part of a bargain. Help yourselves, by considering a quick modification of business practices, by trimming operational fat; and the government will help you help yourselves, by trying to minimise the impact of unpredictable risk on sectors. Chidambaram even said that sector-specific deals might be workable in this climate — normally an invitation to rent-seeking, but in this case a simple expression of pragmatism. Credit remains a problem, true; but banks living in fear of large-scale default cannot paralyse Indian companies when the crisis demands that they adapt fast. Those companies are among the best in the developing world, with managerial depth and expertise that have contributed significantly to the Indian growth story. Now, in trying times, comes another test of their mettle: and the finance minister shouldn’t be attacked for trying to coordinate their response to this test.

    hiBy: AMB | 20-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward I THINK CHARITY BEGINS FROM HOME. GOVERNMENT HAS EXCESS FAT SO DO THE MINISTERS AND HIGHER POLITICIANS IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE TO SEE THAT THE FLAB WAS REDUCED HERE BEFORE ASKING OTHERS TO REDUCE THE RATES.YOU DO NOT WANT TO REDUCE THE RATES OF PETROL BUT YOU WANT OTHERS TO REDUCE THE PRICES.IT IS LIKE SAYING YES YOU CAN BUT WE SHALL NOT
    One-time offer By: M.S. Rajasekaran | 20-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Very recently the salary of the First citizen has ben raised. Theere was an anouncement of 21% pay hike to govt. staff. it is not my case that the govt should deny hike its employees in an unfair manner but about the timing keeping the general election in mind. these were done when there was no abatement in the raising inflation. Many things that smack of fiscal iresponsibility have been done .Will the FM also ask his cabinet collegues, MPs ( the most unproductive lot in the democratic institution), and the President (what is her contribution to the national economy or other inspirational acts), to dotheir bit or whole because they project themselves to be doing a lot of good to the country's progress?
    FMBy: mm | 20-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward And while the PM, when he called the captains of industry, did not say this at all. Do people in this Congress government even talk to eachother?
    corporate social responsibilityBy: ANJAN KUMAR SAMAL | 20-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward It is time for all corporate sectors to reflect their social responsiblity on this eve of dangerous economic depression.Lowering price must stabalize the situation somehow and customers will be more obliged to their concerned sectors as well as the employees will be saved from job insecurity.I advise that corporate sectors should not take it as the pressure but should take it as their part of great social responsibility to overcome from this heart throbing depression.The step taken by the finance minister is really highly admirable and justified.In this country of developing economy all the corporate sectors are here to earn for the vast consumer market.So the time has come to repay them in this way not only for their benifit but also for the socio economic development of this country.Now it should be the objective of all the industries and business houses that "Our destiny , is the nation's economic stability."
    Act TimelyBy: Kishan | 20-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Chidambaram's ask cannot be a binding directive to the Industry.But what are the Industry Associations doing? They have very capable advice available to them.They employ economists.They have on their Boards best brains in the market. Surely they can see what is in the best short and long term interest of the Indian Economy.And what is good for the economy as a whole cannot be bad for Industry and the Consumer who are its two most important parts.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.