Order triggers panic, CIC calls emergency meeting
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- Li Keqiang pitches for more Chinese investments as he backs trade balance
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
- Monstrous tornado rips through US city of Oklahoma, 90 dead

The Supreme Court ruling on Thursday that only serving and retired judges of the apex court and chief justices of high courts can head information commissions startled commissions across the country, with the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) suspending some hearings set for Friday and calling an emergency meeting of Central Information Commissioners to discuss the court order.
Panic-stricken chief information commissioners of many states also called CIC Satyananda Mishra seeking his advice. They were told to consult their state governments for now, sources said.
"The Supreme Court's observations have serious implications on the functioning of the Commission," Mishra said. "Since the function of the commission is to examine appeals, we will have to decide how the benches should be re-organised with judicial members. To discuss all such issues we are holding an emergency meeting tomorrow."
The emergency meeting is expected to lead to the rescheduling of at least four or five hearings scheduled for each commissioner. Mishra is also expected to consult the Centre and seek legal advice after the emergency meeting.
The court order that all benches at information commissions should be two-member benches with one of them a judicial member, is expected to drastically change the way commissions are constituted. Most appeals and complaints are heard by a lone commissioner and in some cases the Chief Information Commissioner constitutes a bench of more than one commissioner. Some cases are heard by the entire commission.
There are 114 commissioners and chief information commissioners at the 27 state commissions and one central commission. Many of them are retired bureaucrats. Thursday's Supreme Court order also implies that the RTI Act would have to be amended as Supreme Court judges retire at the age of 65 and chief justices and judges of high courts retire at 62 while the maximum age for information commissioners is set at 65.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


CBI chief says report on coal block 'clean and clear'
Pak High Commissioner to visit Sanaullah today
Janampatri to genomepatri, the leap forward in predicting future
Despite fast-track courts, rape conviction rate still low



















