Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Our 2004, their 2008

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The permanent establishment really came on its own after the early 1990s’ economic crisis. It is under-appreciated how smartly India’s establishment responded: they used the context of IMF conditions to push through radical domestic reform but disregarded many Fund suggestions. Contrast this to the supposed golden age of India’s economic sovereignty: In 1966, Ashok Mehta, India’s chief planner then, presented fourth plan proposals to the then US president, Lyndon Johnson. The plan was worthless without American aid.

    In the current crisis, too, India’s establishment has responded with centre-right maturity. The priority has been to secure Indian capitalism’s short-term future; there’s no systemic threat in the medium term. The establishment is again being under-appreciated. Consider the following: India’s stock markets haven’t had to shut down despite wild swings. The capital market regulator hasn’t had to ban short sales; America’s and Britain’s have had to. The obdurate central bank bureaucracy has been quietly outmanoeuvred. Rumours haven’t been able to cause a run on banks. Industry has already been told that state help for capitalists can’t be a free lunch.

    Ads by Google

    India’s politics has learnt to let India’s establishment be when there’s a crisis. But in normal times India’s politics is acutely vulnerable to centre-left fancies. Both the Congress and the BJP as political entities bought into the centre-left interpretation of the 2004 verdict. Although both have plenty of people whose economic governance instincts are basically centre-right, their politics is not weighty enough.

    The basic reason is that India doesn’t have a two-party system. The two main parties can’t afford to have a more or less permanent policy view on broad issues because in a fiercely competitive democracy they are vulnerable to smaller niche players who essentially practice the politics of grievance. These parties typically don’t have a stake in national political-economic projects. But they have the potential to influence electoral results.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    economics and india ruleBy: s.n.nagaonkar | 10-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Dear sir,There is always quest to find best ruling methods in all countries.One is china's communist rule which is now capitalistic under the garb of communism .communist party is tired of following party philosophy and taken a short cut to rule by dictatorship.India is always at crossroads of capitalism and communism because of demographic characteristic which is feudal .Traditional ruling class ruling locally in states like Bimaru and regional parties in other states and in some states it is communist rule.Nobody is taking realistic view(ruling class)that india needs to provide security to small farmers to take interest in farming localy in Bimaru states which have most fertile land with ample water resources.If they pay more attention to have health, veternary services in bimaru states employment opportunities will come by agri industries.American model is difficult to practice here till literacy about governance improves.
    Left, Right, Left, Right, Left, RightBy: Anon | 10-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Both the right and left are necessary to come into power alternatively for a country to progress - like two legs which one step after another.In US, the right is now done and its time for the left. In India, the left is done and its time for the right.
    congress performance compared to obama victory.By: M.N.S.Nampoothiripad | 10-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Is winning 145 seats in house of 540 a victory for the congress? Shame shame shame.
    sensibleBy: shishira | 10-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward woof !!after all some one had sensible ..objective look at american elections rather than buying the popular sentiments....kudos..THINK sensible,smart and different
    India and USBy: Kannan | 10-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward IE and it's writers brain wash the readers about Congress' win in 2004. Congress never won the elecitons! Each time IE makes a statement like that, it should publish the number of seats in the Parliament held by BJP and Congress. Congress usurped power illegally by joining hands with the DMK (well-wishers of the killers who made Sonia a widow), Laloo, the man who ruined Bihar and the Left who are paid by the Chinese.
    You said itBy: C.K.Sunil | 10-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Kannan, you said it. You are absolutely right.The author , Chakrabarthy, trys to pose to be an intelluctual spreading this canard. Most of the so called intellegentia paid by the congress are fooling the people on the same line
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.