Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Over Rs 14 cr missing in name of Naxal war in Jharkhand

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Jharkhand follows the Bihar practice where the withdrawal and disbursal officer of the SSE fund is the Additional DGP, Special Branch and the Chief Secretary conducts an administrative audit and furnishes a utilization certificate to the AG.

    Chief Secretary Basu did not conduct an administrative audit nor furnish the utilization certificate. Plus DGP Ram withdrew Rs 5.60 crore in cash from the Secretariat branch of the SBI on March 16, 2006 — a fortnight before Ram gave ADGP G S Rath the withdrawal and disbursal power on April 1, 2006 though Rath had been on the post since August 21, 2005.

    Given this backdrop, Malakar drew the attention of the state government, stating that in accordance with the BFRs “a sufficiently real administrative audit” of secret service funds should have been done and a certificate furnished to the AG.

    “This was not done. In view of the huge amounts involved and the inordinate delay in submission of the requisite documents, the possibility of fraud, embezzlement and misappropriation of government funds cannot be ruled out. In view of the seriousness of the matter, it is requested that immediate action may be taken to investigate the matter and ensure that the rules governing the accounting of the secret service funds are followed scrupulously,” Malakar wrote to Basu on June 17.

    Ads by Google

    When contacted, DGP Ram, a recipient of the President’s police medal for meritorious service and another for distinguished service, said the utilization certificate was not furnished because the state government had not nominated any controlling officer. “The state government has been requested to do the needful to ensure compliance of the administrative audit provision,” he said.

    Previous123
    Matter should be raised in parliamentBy: Mala | 11-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The Indian Express has done its duty. Let us see what happens now. With the parliament in session and the state under President's rule, stalwarts from the state like Yashwant Sinha should raise this matter and compel the government to order a probe.
    Let the judiciary take noticeBy: Sudhir | 11-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I hope the Judiciary takes notice of such corruption and orders a probe. The Accountant General deserves to be congratulated.
    Nothing would happenBy: Meenakshi Gupta | 11-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The record of the Congress party in tackling corruption by the high and the mighty has never been good. Nothing came out of the Bofors or the Narsimha Rao bribery scandal. Shibu Soren in fact was rewarded and made CM. So I don't think anything would happen to Ram and his cohorts. They will be able to bribe their way out.
    PreposterousBy: Praveen Tiwari | 11-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I cannot express my anguish in words. This is preposterous. The DGP should be punished on the same lines as an army officer if he pockets the funds given to him for fighting the enemy. Only then the crooks like him would learn.
    Home Minister should actBy: AK Chandra | 11-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Let us see what does our lawyer Home Minister does, who when out of a job, dons his black coat and appears in the Supreme Court. I am sure he will take appropriate action aginst the people responsible for this murky episode.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.