Pak foreign office disturbed after Tharoor's remarks

13 Comments | Post Comment

Larger | Smaller

Agencies Tags : Shashi Tharoor, joint statement Posted: Saturday , Jul 25, 2009 at 1242 hrs Islamabad:

Tharoor had reportedly said that the India-Pakistan joint statement is a ‘diplomatic paper’ and not a ‘legal document’.

Discount UK Shopping

Discussion
Blogs

This is insane! - By Roy Avalanches - By asim khamrai Sukhna land scam - By BK Bal is a national jo... - By Janam Dominance of marathi - By prathamesh Anglicization - By Akhlesh Mumbai or bombay - By Shrikanth

Amazing Bharatanatyam West Bengal to Waste Bengal Apathetic Politician The S philosophy of vyaSa

Taking exception to the reported remarks of Minister of State for External Affairs Shashi Tharoor on Indo-Pak joint statement, Pakistan today said both sides should refrain from any move that "detract from progress made" at recent talks between the two premiers.

Foreign Office spokesman Abdul Basit said the insinuations made by Tharoor were "unwarranted and inconsistent with diplomatic norms". He was responding to questions on Tharoor's remarks about Pakistan as reported in the Indian media.

Tharoor had reportedly said that the India-Pakistan joint statement issued after the recent meeting between Prime Ministers Manmohan Singh and Yousuf Raza Gilani in the Egypt is a "diplomatic paper" and not a "legal document".

"It is a diplomatic paper that is released to the press -- different from legal papers.

Comments

Post comment

View all Comments (13) |

Pak Foereign Office disturbed over Tharoor remarkBy: Vasoo Kamulkar | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward By now, it must have been 'Dawned' upon Shashi Tharoor that it is time he boldly warned the rogue state of Pakistan and her Foreign Office spokesman Abdul Basit to "BAS-it"; bas karo. Enough is more than enough.Abdul BASit asks Tharoor to refrain from any move that “detract from progress made” at Sharm el Sheikh between the two premiers. ‘Sharam Karo Yar BASit, sau choohe khayke billi chalee Haaj ko!’ you are contemplating upon the Haj pilgrimage after eating hundred mice in Mumbai 26/11, in Parliament House in Delhi, on Kargil mountain-slopes and in various other theatres of the proxy- war initiated by Pakistani Generals Musharruf and Kayani and her burqa-clad Generals Maulana Masood Azahar and Hafiz Saeed.While India is celebrating the 10th anniversary of her Kargil victory today, it is necessary to ponder as to why DID Kargil happen. Two incidents from our history should throw light on the contrasting difference between the Hindu and Muslim psyche. {Part I}

Pak Foereign Office disturbed over Tharoor remarkBy: Vasoo Kamulkar | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward (a)After the victory of the Bangladesh Mukti war in 1971, India unconditionally returned 90,000 Paki prisoners of war. Indira Gandhi could have solved the Kashmir problem then but DID NOT. (b)During the Kargil misadventure, Musharruf returned the dead bodies of four martyred Hindu jawans WITH their genitals CUT OFF. It becomes necessary to quote from the column of the ablest of the Indian Express columnists Tavleen Singh, appearing in Sunday (26-07-09) issue. “ I did a bit of cruising on YouTube before writing this piece and listened first to Masood’s ranting. He boasted about how the jihad could only end in victory because ‘we love death, we seek it out, and they fear death’. He celebrated the destruction of Bamian Buddhas, said that Jews were ‘weaker than mosquitoes and flies’ and mocked India for being a weak country. {PartII }

Pak Foereign Office disturbed over Tharoor remarkBy: Vasoop Kamulkar | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward “ I then switched to an interview that Sayeed gave to the Waqt channel after his release in June. He was asked repeatedly about India and his response every time was to say that India was a duplicitous country that could not be trusted—”They pretend to have peace talks but they are never sincere. They don’t want peace”. These are the men who lead the jihad against India and they have the full support of Pakistan’s government – Tavleen Singh”We can safely discard the ranting of Azahar as his childish outpourings. He is unreservedly coward himself. Were he brave enough to covet death for Islam ; he would not have run away from Tihar Jail to Gandhar on the crutches supplied by Jaswant Singh. I would rather be inclined to glorify Musharraf as a hero than GENERAL Hafiz Saeed. Appreciate the way Mush. Boldly started the Kargil intrusion and faced the ridicule of the aftermath. GENERAL Saeed on the contrary, is duplicitous himself. {Part III }

Pak Foreign Office disturbed over Tharoor remarkBy: Vasoo Kamulkar | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Instead of leading his battalion from the front at the CST and the Taj Hotel, he sacrificed the poor, ill-advised Pakistani young ones with spiritual bribes of seven hundred ‘ladies-in-waiting'. Paki representative Abdul BASit has said that the insinuations made by Tharoor were “unwarranted and inconsistent with diplomatic norms”. That is exactly where Mr Tharoor has gone wrong. Diplomacy is Tharoor’s second nature. As an excellent diplomat on the staff of the UNO, he could ill afford the language, which was not weighed, but BASit is no diplomat; like his masters, he is just a DIP lorable rat on the MAT. They are all well versed in gutter language-lies. {Part IV}

Pak Foereign Office disturbed over Tharoor remarkBy: Vasoo Kamulkar | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward He would not understand the difference between the diplomatic paper and a legal document. At Sharm el Sheikh, Dr. Manmohan Singh was being very nice and diplomatic with Gilani. Joint communiqué signed by him, cannot be said to be legalistically binding on India. Ye sharm kee baat hai ki BASit kuchh samazta nahin. AS Mr Tharoor says, it is a diplomatic paper as released to the Press – different from the legal papers.BASit has further said that both sides should refrain from any move that “detract from progress made” at recent talks between the two premiers.“O John Bunyan, thou shouldst be living at this hour to explain the ‘Pilgrim’s Progress’ to BASit!” Even a two-year-old Hindu child knows what Pakistan means by “Progress”. {Part V}

Close
Please Login

User ID	*
Password	*

	Forgot Password? click here